Literature DB >> 21069545

Responsiveness of the 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Luciana Gazzi Macedo1, Chris G Maher, Jane Latimer, Mark J Hancock, Luciana A C Machado, James H McAuley.   

Abstract

Several versions of the 24-item Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) have been proposed; however, their responsiveness has not been extensively explored. The objective of this study was to compare the responsiveness of four versions of the RMDQ. Perceived disability was measured using the 24-item, two 18-item and an 11-item RMDQ on 1,069 low back pain patients from six randomised controlled trials. Responsiveness was calculated using effect size, Guyatt's responsiveness index (GRI) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Effect size analyses showed that both 18-item versions of the RMDQ were superior to the 24- and 11-item versions of the RMDQ. GRI showed that the 24- and 18-item versions of the RMDQ were similar but more responsive than the 11-item. ROC curves revealed that the 11-item was less responsive than the other three versions, which had similar responsiveness. The results of this study demonstrate that the 24-item and both 18-item versions of the RMDQ have similar responsiveness with all having superior responsiveness to the 11-item.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21069545      PMCID: PMC3048224          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1608-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.

Authors:  W W Tryon
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

2.  24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Raymond W J G Ostelo; Henrica C W de Vet; Dirk L Knol; Piet A van den Brandt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.

Authors:  G Guyatt; S Walter; G Norman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Measurement properties of the RM-18. A modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Scale.

Authors:  P W Stratford; J M Binkley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Liset H M Pengel; Kathryn M Refshauge; Chris G Maher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: intra class correlation and limits of agreement.

Authors:  S Brouwer; W Kuijer; P U Dijkstra; L N H Göeken; J W Groothoff; J H B Geertzen
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Assessment of self-reported physical activity in patients with chronic pain: development of an abbreviated Roland-Morris disability scale.

Authors:  Michael W Stroud; Patrick E McKnight; Mark P Jensen
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Luciana A C Machado; Chris G Maher; Rob D Herbert; Helen Clare; James H McAuley
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: one or more dimensions?

Authors:  Tiê Parma Yamato; Chris G Maher; Bruno T Saragiotto; Mark J Catley; James H McAuley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The impact of endoscopic activity on musculoskeletal disorders of high-volume endoscopists in Germany.

Authors:  N Sturm; J Leukert; L Perkhofer; A Hann; M Wagner; B Mayer; T Seufferlein; J Mayerle; C Schulz; A Meining; E Kraft; Benjamin M Walter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Accelerometer-Determined Physical Activity and Clinical Low Back Pain Measures in Adolescents With Chronic or Subacute Recurrent Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Brent Leininger; Craig Schulz; Zan Gao; Gert Bronfort; Roni Evans; Zachary Pope; Nan Zeng; Mitchell Haas
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Focused Evidence Review: Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Goldsmith; Brent C Taylor; Nancy Greer; Maureen Murdoch; Roderick MacDonald; Lauren McKenzie; Christina E Rosebush; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Spinal manipulation and exercise for low back pain in adolescents: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Roni Evans; Mitchell Haas; Craig Schulz; Brent Leininger; Linda Hanson; Gert Bronfort
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.926

6.  Spinal manipulation and exercise for low back pain in adolescents: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Craig Schulz; Brent Leininger; Roni Evans; Darcy Vavrek; Dave Peterson; Mitchell Haas; Gert Bronfort
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2014-05-23

Review 7.  Treatment Efficacy, Clinical Utility, and Cost-Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation Treatments for Persistent Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cornelia Rolli Salathé; Markus Melloh; Rebecca Crawford; Stephanie Scherrer; Norbert Boos; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-04-19

8.  Impact of Work-Related Chronic Low Back Pain on Functional Performance and Physical Capabilities in Women and Men: A Sex-Wise Comparative Study.

Authors:  Hashim Ahmed; Kamal Kishore; Priyadarshani Bhat; Ahmad H Alghadir; Amir Iqbal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The impact of different intensities and domains of physical activity on analgesic use and activity limitation in people with low back pain: A prospective cohort study with a one-year followup.

Authors:  Thomas G Patterson; Paula R Beckenkamp; Manuela Ferreira; Adrian Bauman; Ana Paula Carvalho-E-Silva; Lucas Calais Ferreira; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.651

10.  Tracking patient-reported outcomes in spinal disorders.

Authors:  Nikhil R Nayak; John Mitchell Coats; Kalil G Abdullah; Sherman C Stein; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-10-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.