Literature DB >> 21069439

Alarm pheromones do not mediate rapid shifts in honey bee guard acceptance threshold.

Margaret J Couvillon1, Sarah N Barton, Jennifer A Cohen, Onna K Fabricius, Martin H Kärcher, Lee S Cooper, Matthew J Silk, Heikki Helanterä, Francis L W Ratnieks.   

Abstract

Honey bee (Apis mellifera) guards discriminate nestmates from non-nestmates at the hive entrance. The acceptance threshold of guards is known to change adaptively, for example becoming less permissive when the number of intruder bees from other colonies increases. These adaptive shifts can occur within minutes. What is unknown is the mechanism behind this rapid shift. It was hypothesized that alarm pheromones released by guards may cause the adoption of a less permissive acceptance threshold. Here, we tested this hypothesis on five discriminator hives by using a behavioral assay. We used three amounts each of iso-pentyl acetate (IPA) and 2-heptanone (2H), which are the major components of the pheromones from the sting and the mandibular glands, respectively. Biologically relevant levels of chemicals were delivered to the hive entrance platform via an air pump. We found no effect of either IPA or 2H: there was no change in guard acceptance of either nestmate (on average, 91% accepted) or non-nestmate (on average, 30% accepted) under any of the pheromone treatments compared to the pentane control (98% nestmates accepted and 32% non-nestmates accepted). Therefore, we reject the hypothesis that the presence of IPA or 2H causes a rapid shift of guard acceptance threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21069439     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-010-9881-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  3 in total

1.  Identification of isoamyl acetate as an active component in the sting pheromone of the honey bee.

Authors:  R BOCH; D A SHEARER; B C STONE
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Recognition errors by honey bee (Apis mellifera) guards demonstrate overlapping cues in conspecific recognition.

Authors:  Margaret J Couvillon; Gabrielle G F Roy; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  J Apic Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Volatile emission by contest losers revealed by real-time chemical analysis.

Authors:  Marlène Goubault; Tim P Batchelor; Robert S T Linforth; Andrew J Taylor; Ian C W Hardy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Extracting individual characteristics from population data reveals a negative social effect during honeybee defence.

Authors:  Tatjana Petrov; Matej Hajnal; Julia Klein; David Šafránek; Morgane Nouvian
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.779

2.  The bite of the honeybee: 2-heptanone secreted from honeybee mandibles during a bite acts as a local anaesthetic in insects and mammals.

Authors:  Alexandros Papachristoforou; Alexia Kagiava; Chrisovalantis Papaefthimiou; Aikaterini Termentzi; Nikolas Fokialakis; Alexios-Leandros Skaltsounis; Max Watkins; Gérard Arnold; George Theophilidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates.

Authors:  L W Pisa; V Amaral-Rogers; L P Belzunces; J M Bonmatin; C A Downs; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C Krupke; M Liess; M McField; C A Morrissey; D A Noome; J Settele; N Simon-Delso; J D Stark; J P Van der Sluijs; H Van Dyck; M Wiemers
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.