Literature DB >> 21069115

Increasing the uptake of opportunistic chlamydia screening: a pilot study in general practice.

Beverley A Lawton1, Sally B Rose, C Raina Elley, Collette Bromhead, E Jane MacDonald, Michael G Baker.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infection is common and associated with considerable personal and public health cost. Effective detection strategies are needed. AIM: To assess feasibility of an opportunistic incentivised chlamydia screening programme in general practice over six months.
METHODS: This study was designed as a pilot for a randomised controlled trial in primary care. Three general practices were randomly allocated to intervention (two practices) and control groups. The intervention involved practice education, self-sample collection and practice incentives (funding and feedback) for a three-month 'active' intervention period. Feedback and education was discontinued during the second three-month period. Practice-specific nurse- or doctor-led strategies were developed for identifying, testing, treating and recalling male and female patients aged 16-24 years. The main outcome measure was the difference between the practices' chlamydia screening rates over the six months following introduction of the intervention, controlling for baseline rates from the previous year.
RESULTS: Chlamydia testing rates during the year prior to the intervention ranged from 2.9% to 7.0% of practice attendances by 16-24-year-olds. The intervention practices had higher rates of screening compared with the control practice (p<0.001) at three months, but both practices reverted to pre-intervention rates by six months. The nurse-led screening strategy was more effective (35% declining to 5.5% over six months) than the doctor-led strategy (15% declining to 1.6% over six months) (p=0.04). DISCUSSION: Incentivised opportunistic chlamydia screening of 16-24-year-old patients attending their general practitioner with a programme involving practice education, feedback and self-sample collection can increase screening rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21069115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 1172-6156


  5 in total

Review 1.  Screening for genital chlamydia infection.

Authors:  Nicola Low; Shelagh Redmond; Anneli Uusküla; Jan van Bergen; Helen Ward; Berit Andersen; Hannelore Götz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-13

2.  Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions.

Authors:  Rebecca Lorch; Jane Hocking; Rebecca Guy; Alaina Vaisey; Anna Wood; Basil Donovan; Christopher Fairley; Jane Gunn; John Kaldor; Meredith Temple-Smith
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Practice nurse chlamydia testing in Australian general practice: a qualitative study of benefits, barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Rebecca Lorch; Jane Hocking; Rebecca Guy; Alaina Vaisey; Anna Wood; Dyani Lewis; Meredith Temple-Smith
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Increasing chlamydia screening tests in general practice: a modified Zelen prospective Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial evaluating a complex intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.

Authors:  Cliodna A M McNulty; Angela H Hogan; Ellie J Ricketts; Louise Wallace; Isabel Oliver; Rona Campbell; Sebastian Kalwij; Elaine O'Connell; Andre Charlett
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Service evaluation of an educational intervention to improve sexual health services in primary care implemented using a step-wedge design: analysis of chlamydia testing and diagnosis rate changes.

Authors:  Katy Town; Cliodna A M McNulty; Ellie J Ricketts; Thomas Hartney; Anthony Nardone; Kate A Folkard; Andre Charlett; J Kevin Dunbar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.