Literature DB >> 21068714

[18F]FDG-PET/CT monitoring early identifies advanced ovarian cancer patients who will benefit from prolonged neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

A A Martoni1, S Fanti, C Zamagni, M Rosati, P De Iaco, A D'Errico Grigioni, P Castellucci, S Quercia, A Musto, L Ricci Maccarini, E Lopci, A Bernardi.   

Abstract

AIM: The most accepted standard duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (na-CHT) before debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) is 3 courses. However a percentage of patients could benefit from additional courses. [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT monitoring during na-CHT could predict early pathological response and allow the delivery of an optimal na-CHT duration.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with AOC unsuitable for optimal up front surgery and fit for na-CHT were monitored by FDG-PET/CT at baseline and after 3 and 6 courses of carboplatin-paclitaxel CHT. At the end of na-CHT patients were re-evaluated to undergo definitive optimal surgery (i.e. without post-surgical residual disease). Percentage changes in maximal standardized uptake value (∆-SUVmax) were compared with the pathological response. Only patients with pathological complete response (pCR) or minimal residual disease (pMRD) were considered as pathological responders (pR), while all the other cases were considered non-responders (NR).
RESULTS: Baseline FDG-PET/CT was abnormal in all 42 enrolled patients (median SUVmax 11, range 3-20). After 3 and 6 courses median SUVmax decreased to 3 (<2-21) and <2, i.e. value equal to normal surrounding tissues uptake (<2-17), respectively. After 3 courses, 17 (40%) patients presented ∆-SUVmax=100%, (i.e. SUVmax <2): 15 of them (88%) subsequently resulted pR and achieved no postsurgical residual disease at the end of na-CHT, while 2 (12%) were NR with postsurgical residual tumor ≤ 1cm. Out of 25 patients with ∆-SUVmax <100% after 3 courses, 6 (24%) were pR and 19 (76%) NR at the end of na-CHT.
CONCLUSION: Patients with AOC who present normalization of SUVmax after 3 courses of na-CT have a high likelihood of benefiting from 3 additional courses in order to obtain pCR or pMDR and receiving optimal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21068714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1824-4785            Impact factor:   2.346


  9 in total

1.  The role of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Won Lee; Arthur Cho; Jae-Hoon Lee; Mijin Yun; Jong Doo Lee; Young Tae Kim; Won Jun Kang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  An update on the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Benjapa Khiewvan; Drew A Torigian; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Koosha Paydary; Ali Salavati; Sina Houshmand; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  What's New in Imaging for Gynecologic Cancer?

Authors:  Sairah R Khan; Mubarik Arshad; Kathryn Wallitt; Victoria Stewart; Nishat Bharwani; Tara D Barwick
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  New ways of assessing ovarian cancer response: metabolic imaging and beyond.

Authors:  Andrea Rockall; Alice Munari; Norbert Avril
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Imaging of treatment response to the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel in human ovarian cancer xenograft tumors in mice using FDG and FLT PET.

Authors:  Mette Munk Jensen; Kamille Dumong Erichsen; Fredrik Björkling; Jacob Madsen; Peter Buhl Jensen; Maxwell Sehested; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  FOXM1 promotes reprogramming of glucose metabolism in epithelial ovarian cancer cells via activation of GLUT1 and HK2 transcription.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Yuyu Yun; Bo Wu; Li Wen; Mingling Wen; Huiling Yang; Lisheng Zhao; Wenchao Liu; Suyun Huang; Ning Wen; Yu Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-26

7.  Early Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Young Shin Chung; Hyun-Soo Kim; Jung-Yun Lee; Won Jun Kang; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 8.  Neoadjuvant treatment for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: where do we stand and where are we going?

Authors:  Michele Moschetta; Stergios Boussios; Elie Rassy; Eleftherios P Samartzis; Gabriel Funingana; Mario Uccello
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

Review 9.  A Review of Nuclear Medicine Approaches in the Diagnosis and the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Nasim Vahidfar; Saeed Farzanefar; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Eóin N Molloy; Elisabeth Eppard
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.