OBJECTIVE: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Following STN-DBS, speech intelligibility can deteriorate, limiting its beneficial effect. Here we prospectively examined the short- and long-term speech response to STN-DBS in a consecutive series of patients to identify clinical and surgical factors associated with speech change. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients were assessed before surgery, then 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after STN-DBS in 4 conditions on- and off-medication with on- and off-stimulation using established and validated speech and movement scales. Fifteen of these patients were followed up for 3 years. A control group of 12 patients with PD were followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: Within the surgical group, speech intelligibility significantly deteriorated by an average of 14.2%±20.15% off-medication and 16.9%±21.8% on-medication 1 year after STN-DBS. The medical group deteriorated by 3.6%±5.5% and 4.5%±8.8%, respectively. Seven patients showed speech amelioration after surgery. Loudness increased significantly in all tasks with stimulation. A less severe preoperative on-medication motor score was associated with a more favorable speech response to STN-DBS after 1 year. Medially located electrodes on the left STN were associated with a significantly higher risk of speech deterioration than electrodes within the nucleus. There was a strong relationship between high voltage in the left electrode and poor speech outcome at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The effect of STN-DBS on speech is variable and multifactorial, with most patients exhibiting decline of speech intelligibility. Both medical and surgical issues contribute to deterioration of speech in STN-DBS patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that STN-DBS for PD results in deterioration in speech intelligibility in all combinations of medication and stimulation states at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year compared to baseline and to control subjects treated with best medical therapy.
OBJECTIVE: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Following STN-DBS, speech intelligibility can deteriorate, limiting its beneficial effect. Here we prospectively examined the short- and long-term speech response to STN-DBS in a consecutive series of patients to identify clinical and surgical factors associated with speech change. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients were assessed before surgery, then 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after STN-DBS in 4 conditions on- and off-medication with on- and off-stimulation using established and validated speech and movement scales. Fifteen of these patients were followed up for 3 years. A control group of 12 patients with PD were followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: Within the surgical group, speech intelligibility significantly deteriorated by an average of 14.2%±20.15% off-medication and 16.9%±21.8% on-medication 1 year after STN-DBS. The medical group deteriorated by 3.6%±5.5% and 4.5%±8.8%, respectively. Seven patients showed speech amelioration after surgery. Loudness increased significantly in all tasks with stimulation. A less severe preoperative on-medication motor score was associated with a more favorable speech response to STN-DBS after 1 year. Medially located electrodes on the left STN were associated with a significantly higher risk of speech deterioration than electrodes within the nucleus. There was a strong relationship between high voltage in the left electrode and poor speech outcome at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The effect of STN-DBS on speech is variable and multifactorial, with most patients exhibiting decline of speech intelligibility. Both medical and surgical issues contribute to deterioration of speech in STN-DBS patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that STN-DBS for PD results in deterioration in speech intelligibility in all combinations of medication and stimulation states at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year compared to baseline and to control subjects treated with best medical therapy.
Authors: F Klostermann; F Ehlen; J Vesper; K Nubel; M Gross; F Marzinzik; G Curio; T Sappok Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Paul Krack; Alina Batir; Nadège Van Blercom; Stephan Chabardes; Valérie Fraix; Claire Ardouin; Adnan Koudsie; Patricia Dowsey Limousin; Abdelhamid Benazzouz; Jean François LeBas; Alim-Louis Benabid; Pierre Pollak Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-11-13 Impact factor: 91.245