Literature DB >> 21068187

Endogenous auditory spatial attention modulates obligatory sensory activity in auditory cortex.

Alan J Power1, Edmund C Lalor, Richard B Reilly.   

Abstract

Endogenous attention is the self-directed focus of attention to a region or feature of the environment. In this study, we assess the effects of endogenous attention on temporally detailed responses to continuous and competing auditory stimuli obtained using the novel auditory evoked spread spectrum analysis (AESPA) method. There is some debate as to whether an enhancement of sensory processing is involved in endogenous attention. It has been suggested that attentional effects are not due to increased sensory activity but are due to engagement of separate temporally overlapping nonsensory attention-related activity. There are also issues with the fact that the influence of exogenous attention grabbing mechanisms may hamper studies of endogenous attention. Due to the nature of the AESPA method, the obtained responses represent activity directly related to the stimulus envelope and thus predominantly correspond to obligatory sensory processing. In addition, the continuous nature of the stimuli minimizes exogenous attentional influence. We found attentional modulations at ~136 ms (during the Nc component of the AESPA response) and localized this to auditory cortex. Although the involvement of separate nonsensory attentional centers cannot be ruled out, these findings clearly demonstrate that endogenous attention does modulate obligatory sensory activity in auditory cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21068187     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  9 in total

1.  Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A visual or tactile signal makes auditory speech detection more efficient by reducing uncertainty.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Ewen Chao; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Jeremy W Murphy; Richard B Reilly; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Individual differences in attentional modulation of cortical responses correlate with selective attention performance.

Authors:  Inyong Choi; Le Wang; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Suppression of competing speech through entrainment of cortical oscillations.

Authors:  Cort Horton; Michael D'Zmura; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-06

Review 7.  Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: functional roles and interpretations.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Selective Attention Enhances Beta-Band Cortical Oscillation to Speech under "Cocktail-Party" Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Yayue Gao; Qian Wang; Yu Ding; Changming Wang; Haifeng Li; Xihong Wu; Tianshu Qu; Liang Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Attention Differentially Affects Acoustic and Phonetic Feature Encoding in a Multispeaker Environment.

Authors:  Emily S Teoh; Farhin Ahmed; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.