Literature DB >> 21068003

Fast and efficient dynamic nested effects models.

Holger Fröhlich1, Paurush Praveen, Achim Tresch.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Targeted interventions in combination with the measurement of secondary effects can be used to computationally reverse engineer features of upstream non-transcriptional signaling cascades. Nested effect models (NEMs) have been introduced as a statistical approach to estimate the upstream signal flow from downstream nested subset structure of perturbation effects. The method was substantially extended later on by several authors and successfully applied to various datasets. The connection of NEMs to Bayesian Networks and factor graph models has been highlighted.
RESULTS: Here, we introduce a computationally attractive extension of NEMs that enables the analysis of perturbation time series data, hence allowing to discriminate between direct and indirect signaling and to resolve feedback loops. AVAILABILITY: The implementation (R and C) is part of the Supplement to this article.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21068003     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  13 in total

1.  Considering unknown unknowns: reconstruction of nonconfoundable causal relations in biological networks.

Authors:  Mohammad J Sadeh; Giusi Moffa; Rainer Spang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  NEM-Tar: A Probabilistic Graphical Model for Cancer Regulatory Network Inference and Prioritization of Potential Therapeutic Targets From Multi-Omics Data.

Authors:  Yuchen Zhang; Lina Zhu; Xin Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Linear effects models of signaling pathways from combinatorial perturbation data.

Authors:  Ewa Szczurek; Niko Beerenwinkel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  NEMix: single-cell nested effects models for probabilistic pathway stimulation.

Authors:  Juliane Siebourg-Polster; Daria Mudrak; Mario Emmenlauer; Pauli Rämö; Christoph Dehio; Urs Greber; Holger Fröhlich; Niko Beerenwinkel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Inferring modulators of genetic interactions with epistatic nested effects models.

Authors:  Martin Pirkl; Madeline Diekmann; Marlies van der Wees; Niko Beerenwinkel; Holger Fröhlich; Florian Markowetz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Single cell network analysis with a mixture of Nested Effects Models.

Authors:  Martin Pirkl; Niko Beerenwinkel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Improved pathway reconstruction from RNA interference screens by exploiting off-target effects.

Authors:  Sumana Srivatsa; Jack Kuipers; Fabian Schmich; Simone Eicher; Mario Emmenlauer; Christoph Dehio; Niko Beerenwinkel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Reconstruction of cellular signal transduction networks using perturbation assays and linear programming.

Authors:  Bettina Knapp; Lars Kaderali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inferring regulatory networks by combining perturbation screens and steady state gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Ali Shojaie; Alexandra Jauhiainen; Michael Kallitsis; George Michailidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Analyzing synergistic and non-synergistic interactions in signalling pathways using Boolean Nested Effect Models.

Authors:  Martin Pirkl; Elisabeth Hand; Dieter Kube; Rainer Spang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.