Literature DB >> 21067845

[Calculations of mean refraction and variation of refraction using a dioptric space].

O Touzeau1, E Costantini, T Gaujoux, V Borderie, L Laroche.   

Abstract

Polar notations (sphere, cylinder, and axis) of refraction perfectly characterize a single refraction but are not suitable for statistical analysis or graphic representation. While the spherical component of refraction can be easily analyzed by the spherical equivalent, statistical analysis of astigmatism requires non-polar expressions of refraction. Indeed, the cylinder and axis of astigmatism are not independent data. In addition, axis is a directional data including a non-trigonometric cycle. Refraction can be written in a non-polar notation by three rectangular coordinates (x, y, z), which can also represent the spherocylinder by one point in a dioptric space. These three coordinates constitute three independent (orthogonal) variables that correspond to a sphere-equivalent component and a pair of Jackson cross-cylinder components, oriented at 0°/90° (WTR/ATR astigmatism) and 45°/135° (oblique astigmatism). Statistical analysis and graphical representation become less complicated when using rectangular coordinates of refraction. Rectangular coordinates of the mean refraction are obtained by average rectangular coordinates. Similarly, rectangular coordinates of refraction change are obtained by a single subtraction of rectangular coordinates between the final and initial refractions. After statistical analysis, the rectangular coordinates obtained can be converted into a polar form for a more easily understood result. Finally, non-polar notations including rectangular coordinates are useful for statistical and graphical analysis, which would be difficult with only conventional polar notations of refraction.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21067845     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2010.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol        ISSN: 0181-5512            Impact factor:   0.818


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of non-cycloplegic photorefraction, cycloplegic photorefraction and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.

Authors:  Ozdemir Ozdemir; Zuhal Özen Tunay; Ikbal Seza Petriçli; Damla Ergintürk Acar; Muhammet Kazım Erol
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Cataract and glaucoma combined surgery: XEN® gel stent versus nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy, a pilot study.

Authors:  Vincent Theillac; Esther Blumen-Ohana; Jad Akesbi; Pascale Hamard; Alexandre Sellam; Emmanuelle Brasnu; Christophe Baudouin; Antoine Labbe; Jean-Philippe Nordmann
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Correlation analysis of physical fitness and retinal microvasculature by OCT angiography in healthy adults.

Authors:  Pieter Nelis; Boris Schmitz; Andreas Klose; Florian Rolfes; Maged Alnawaiseh; Michael Krüger; Nicole Eter; Stefan-Martin Brand; Florian Alten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.