Literature DB >> 21067473

Differences in preferences for obstetric care between nulliparae and their partners in the Netherlands: a discrete-choice experiment.

Marijke Hendrix1, Milena Pavlova, Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze, Johan L Severens, Jan G Nijhuis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, in low-risk pregnancies, the views of pregnant women and their partners on characteristics of obstetric care services are leading for the selection of place of birth. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are differences between the decision-making process of pregnant women and their partners with regard to these attributes of obstetric care.
METHODS: This study was a prospective cohort study with low-risk nulliparae and their partners. A questionnaire, based on the method of discrete-choice experiment, was used to gather the data.
RESULTS: Possibility of influencing decision-making was, both for pregnant women (n = 321) and their partners (n = 212), the most important characteristic of the obstetric care. For women, a home-like birth setting was an important characteristic, while the partners found the possibility on pain-relief treatment during birth important.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that women and their partners have clearly defined preferences for obstetric care. There are also some essential differences between the preferences of these two groups. The findings are important where policy issues related to aspects of maternity care service delivery are being considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21067473     DOI: 10.3109/0167482X.2010.527400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0167-482X            Impact factor:   2.949


  6 in total

Review 1.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Trading patients' choice in providers for quality of maternity care? A discrete choice experiment amongst pregnant women.

Authors:  Mattijs S Lambooij; Jorien Veldwijk; Paul F van Gils; Anita W M Suijkerbuijk; Jeroen N Struijs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  A comprehensive representation of the birth-experience: identification and prioritization of birth-specific domains based on a mixed-method design.

Authors:  Fania R Gärtner; Liv M Freeman; Marlies E Rijnders; Johanna M Middeldorp; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Anne M Stiggelbout; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  'She convinced me'- partner involvement in choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Martine Hollander; Esteriek de Miranda; Anne-Marike Smit; Irene de Graaf; Frank Vandenbussche; Jeroen van Dillen; Lianne Holten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Women's preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Kirsten Howard; Karen Gerard; Pamela Adelson; Robert Bryce; Chris Wilkinson; Deborah Turnbull
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Women's birth place preferences in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the quantitative literature.

Authors:  Jennifer Hollowell; Yangmei Li; Reem Malouf; James Buchanan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.