Literature DB >> 21066986

Laparoscopic-assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

S Achkasov1, G Vorobiev, A Zhuchenko, M Rinchinov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative morbidity after reversal of Hartmann's procedure remains high. AIM: to evaluate efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 36 patients (19 men, aged 55.71 +/- 1.5 years) underwent laparoscopic-assisted reversal procedures in May 2008 - June 2010. The comparable control group consisted of 35 patients (16 men, aged 51.5 +/- 13.9 years).
RESULTS: operation time was 179.5 +/- 65.1 min, 266.9 +/- 71.8 min in controls. Blood loss was 64.7 +/- 33.7 ml, 181.8 +/- 120.4 ml in controls. No conversions occurred in the main group. In three patients of the main group preventive ileostomy was performed. There were 11 diverting stomas in the control group. Postoperative hospital stays were 9.1 +/- 2.7 days (12.9 +/- 3.4 days in controls). There were 2 (5.9%) postoperative complications in the main group: one wound infection and one parastomal fistula. No mortality occurred. In the control group 3 (9.1%) complications (wound infection and haematoma) were detected.
CONCLUSION: laparoscopic-assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure promotes faster rehabilitation, its results are not worse than after open approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21066986     DOI: 10.2298/aci1003059a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Iugosl        ISSN: 0354-950X


  4 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Hartmann Takedown: A Meta-analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Diego Coletta; Celeste Del Basso; Giuseppe Giuliani; Alberto Patriti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Chavrier; A Alves; B Menahem
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  A comparative study between open versus laparoscopic Hartmann reversal: A single-center experience and analysis.

Authors:  Hye Jung Cho; Woo Ram Kim; Jong Woo Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.