Literature DB >> 21063937

Current and future status of stem cell therapy in heart failure.

David A D'Alessandro1, Robert E Michler.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: As heart transplantation and mechanical assist technology are inadequate solutions for the growing clinical epidemic of heart failure, myocardial regeneration has moved to the forefront. Multiple laboratories using a variety of cell types have demonstrated myocardial repair in different animal models. Translating these results into clinical practice through clinical trial research has thus far proved challenging. Amassing clinical evidence suggests that cell therapy is safe and offers a modest clinical benefit, but the long-term effect of such therapy as well as the overall impact on the natural progression of heart failure and, ultimately, survival are unknown. Furthermore, cost-benefit analysis of such therapy, which will likely become increasingly important as health care reform takes shape, has not been examined to any degree. Although scientific competition has driven this field with remarkable speed, it is also responsible for its fragmentation, with multiple avenues of pursuit happening in parallel. Consensus opinion is absent with respect to mechanism of action, effectiveness of cell type or delivery method, timing and dosing of cell therapy, adjunctive medication or therapies, and optimum cell type or combination of cell types. Nevertheless, in the arena of clinical medicine, ease of cell availability and cell delivery has proved paramount to cell type selection. The flourish of clinical trials investigating bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) delivered via direct intracoronary injection testifies to this opinion. The modest improvements in cardiac function demonstrated in trials to date will likely not have a significant clinical impact. We expect, however, that scientific competition will make continued contributions over the next decade that will propel the field forward, resulting in more pronounced clinical benefits in future trials. The authors further believe that the realization of true cardiac regeneration will require the use of autologous cells more capable of retention and differentiation to cardiac cell lineages. We believe that endogenous cardiac progenitor cells have superior regenerative potential to current cell types in this regard. The difficulty in accessing, isolating, and expanding these cells has resulted in less preclinical and clinical interest. Ongoing investigation will better define the capabilities of these cardiac progenitor cells.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21063937     DOI: 10.1007/s11936-010-0099-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1092-8464


  59 in total

1.  Intracoronary bone marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: eighteen months' follow-up data from the randomized, controlled BOOST (BOne marrOw transfer to enhance ST-elevation infarct regeneration) trial.

Authors:  Gerd P Meyer; Kai C Wollert; Joachim Lotz; Jan Steffens; Peter Lippolt; Stephanie Fichtner; Hartmut Hecker; Arnd Schaefer; Lubomir Arseniev; Bernd Hertenstein; Arnold Ganser; Helmut Drexler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Intracoronary infusion of CD133+ endothelial progenitor cells improves heart function and quality of life in patients with chronic post-infarct heart insufficiency.

Authors:  Ramiro Flores-Ramírez; Artemio Uribe-Longoria; María M Rangel-Fuentes; Pedro Gutiérrez-Fajardo; Rosario Salazar-Riojas; Daniel Cervantes-García; José H Treviño-Ortiz; Genoveva J Benavides-Chereti; Luciana P Espinosa-Oliveros; Ramón H Limón-Rodríguez; Rogelio Monreal-Puente; Juan L González-Treviño; Augusto Rojas-Martínez
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun

3.  The acute and long-term effects of intracoronary Stem cell Transplantation in 191 patients with chronic heARt failure: the STAR-heart study.

Authors:  Bodo-Eckehard Strauer; Muhammad Yousef; Christiana M Schannwell
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 15.534

4.  Characterization of human bone marrow fibroblast colony-forming cells (CFU-F) and their progeny.

Authors:  H Castro-Malaspina; R E Gay; G Resnick; N Kapoor; P Meyers; D Chiarieri; S McKenzie; H E Broxmeyer; M A Moore
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Intracoronary bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Volker Schächinger; Sandra Erbs; Albrecht Elsässer; Werner Haberbosch; Rainer Hambrecht; Hans Hölschermann; Jiangtao Yu; Roberto Corti; Detlef G Mathey; Christian W Hamm; Tim Süselbeck; Birgit Assmus; Torsten Tonn; Stefanie Dimmeler; Andreas M Zeiher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Regenerating functional myocardium: improved performance after skeletal myoblast transplantation.

Authors:  D A Taylor; B Z Atkins; P Hungspreugs; T R Jones; M C Reedy; K A Hutcheson; D D Glower; W E Kraus
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  The Myoblast Autologous Grafting in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (MAGIC) trial: first randomized placebo-controlled study of myoblast transplantation.

Authors:  Philippe Menasché; Ottavio Alfieri; Stefan Janssens; William McKenna; Hermann Reichenspurner; Ludovic Trinquart; Jean-Thomas Vilquin; Jean-Pierre Marolleau; Barbara Seymour; Jérôme Larghero; Stephen Lake; Gilles Chatellier; Scott Solomon; Michel Desnos; Albert A Hagège
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Rationale and design for TIME: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial evaluating the safety and effect of timing of administration of bone marrow mononuclear cells after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jay H Traverse; Timothy D Henry; Douglas E Vaughan; Douglas E Vaughn; Stephen G Ellis; Carl J Pepine; James T Willerson; David X M Zhao; Linda B Piller; Marc S Penn; Barry J Byrne; Emerson C Perin; Adrian P Gee; Antonis K Hatzopoulos; David H McKenna; John R Forder; Doris A Taylor; Christopher R Cogle; Rachel E Olson; Beth C Jorgenson; Shelly L Sayre; Rachel W Vojvodic; David J Gordon; Sonia I Skarlatos; Lemuel A Moye'; Robert D Simari
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Identification of a coronary vascular progenitor cell in the human heart.

Authors:  Claudia Bearzi; Annarosa Leri; Francesco Lo Monaco; Marcello Rota; Arantxa Gonzalez; Toru Hosoda; Martino Pepe; Khaled Qanud; Caroline Ojaimi; Silvana Bardelli; Domenico D'Amario; David A D'Alessandro; Robert E Michler; Stefanie Dimmeler; Andreas M Zeiher; Konrad Urbanek; Thomas H Hintze; Jan Kajstura; Piero Anversa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Long-term efficacy of myoblast transplantation on regional structure and function after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Saïd Ghostine; Claire Carrion; Luiz César Guarita Souza; Pascal Richard; Patrick Bruneval; Jean-Thomas Vilquin; Bruno Pouzet; Ketty Schwartz; Philippe Menasché; Albert Alain Hagège
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for tissue engineering cardiac constructs to affect functional repair following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kathy Yuan Ye; Lauren Deems Black
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Heterogeneity in SDF-1 expression defines the vasculogenic potential of adult cardiac progenitor cells.

Authors:  Claudia O Rodrigues; Lina A Shehadeh; Michael Hoosien; Valerie Otero; Ines Chopra; Nicholas F Tsinoremas; Nanette H Bishopric
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.