Literature DB >> 21063245

Prolonged prophylaxis with valganciclovir is cost effective in reducing posttransplant cytomegalovirus disease within the United States.

Emily A Blumberg1, Ingeborg A Hauser, Sanja Stanisic, Elvira Mueller, Karina Berenson, Christoph G Gahlemann, Atul Humar, Alan G Jardine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in transplant patients is known to have a substantial clinical and economic burden, and its prevention is expected to have long-term benefits. Evidence from the Improved Protection Against CMV in Transplant trial proved that prolonged prophylaxis of 200 days with valganciclovir compared with 100 days significantly reduces the incidence of CMV in high-risk kidney transplant seropositive donors/seronegative recipients. The aim of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model to evaluate prolonged prophylaxis of 200 days with valganciclovir and its long-term economic impact.
METHODS: An economic model was designed to simulate long-term costs and outcomes of prolonged prophylaxis with valganciclovir (200 vs. 100 days) in a cohort of 10,000 high-risk renal transplant patients over 5 and 10 years. The first year of the model was based on the results of the Improved Protection Against CMV in Transplant trial and the extension to the long-term periods (5 and 10 years); and quality of life data were based on evidence retrieved through a systematic literature search. This analysis was conducted from the US healthcare payer perspective.
RESULTS: For the 5-year time horizon, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US $14,859/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) suggests that 200-day valganciclovir prophylaxis is cost effective over the 100-day regimen considering a threshold of US $50,000/QALY. The 10-year analysis revealed the 200-day prophylaxis as cost saving with a 2380 QALY gain and simultaneously lower cost.
CONCLUSION: Prolonged prophylaxis with valganciclovir reduces the incidence of events associated with CMV infection in high-risk kidney transplant recipients and is a cost-effective strategy in CMV disease management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21063245     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ff500d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  Human cytomegalovirus infection and atherothrombosis.

Authors:  Milan Popović; Katarina Smiljanić; Branislava Dobutović; Tatiana Syrovets; Thomas Simmet; Esma R Isenović
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  A computer simulation model of the cost-effectiveness of routine Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization among lung and heart-lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  C J Clancy; S M Bartsch; M H Nguyen; D R Stuckey; R K Shields; B Y Lee
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of timely dialysis referral after renal transplant failure in Spain.

Authors:  Guillermo Villa; Emilio Sánchez-Álvarez; Jesús Cuervo; Lucía Fernández-Ortiz; Pablo Rebollo; Francisco Ortega
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Use of leflunomide in renal transplant recipients with ganciclovir-resistant/refractory cytomegalovirus infection: a case series from the University of Chicago.

Authors:  W James Chon; Pradeep V Kadambi; Chang Xu; Yolanda T Becker; Piotr Witkowski; Kenneth Pursell; Brenna Kane; Michelle A Josephson
Journal:  Case Rep Nephrol Dial       Date:  2015-04-01

5.  Burden of cytomegalovirus reactivation post kidney transplant with antithymocyte globulin use in Thailand: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Maria N Chitasombat; Siriorn P Watcharananan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-09-28

6.  CMV specific T cell immune response in hepatitis C negative kidney transplant recipients receiving transplant from hepatitis C viremic donors and hepatitis C aviremic donors.

Authors:  Ambreen Azhar; Makoto Tsujita; Manish Talwar; Vasanthi Balaraman; Anshul Bhalla; James D Eason; Simonne S Nouer; Keiichi Sumida; Adam Remport; Isaac E Hall; Randi Griffin; George Rofaiel; Miklos Z Molnar
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 3.222

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.