BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Current methods to diagnose malignant biliary strictures are of low sensitivity. Confocal endomicroscopy is a new approach that may improve the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate indeterminate biliary strictures using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and to understand the histologic basis for the confocal images. METHODS: Fourteen patients with indeterminate biliary strictures underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with examination of their common bile duct with fluorescein-aided probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Standard brushings and biopsies were performed. In parallel, rat bile ducts were examined either with conventional staining and light microscopy or with multiphoton microscopy. RESULTS: Earlier published criteria were used to evaluate possible malignancy in the confocal images obtained in the 14 patients. None of the individual criteria were found to be specific enough for malignancy, but a normal-appearing reticular pattern without other putative markers of malignancy was observed in all normal patients. Multiphoton reconstructions of intact rat bile ducts revealed that the reticular pattern seen in normal tissue was in the same focal plane but was smaller than blood vessels. Special stains identified the smaller structures in this network as lymphatics. CONCLUSIONS: Our limited series suggests that a negative confocal imaging study of the biliary tree can be used to rule out carcinoma, but there are frequent false positives using individual earlier published criteria. An abnormal reticular network, which may reflect changes in lymphatics, was never seen in benign strictures. Better correlation with known histologic structures may lead to improved accuracy of diagnoses.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Current methods to diagnose malignant biliary strictures are of low sensitivity. Confocal endomicroscopy is a new approach that may improve the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate indeterminate biliary strictures using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and to understand the histologic basis for the confocal images. METHODS: Fourteen patients with indeterminate biliary strictures underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with examination of their common bile duct with fluorescein-aided probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Standard brushings and biopsies were performed. In parallel, rat bile ducts were examined either with conventional staining and light microscopy or with multiphoton microscopy. RESULTS: Earlier published criteria were used to evaluate possible malignancy in the confocal images obtained in the 14 patients. None of the individual criteria were found to be specific enough for malignancy, but a normal-appearing reticular pattern without other putative markers of malignancy was observed in all normal patients. Multiphoton reconstructions of intact rat bile ducts revealed that the reticular pattern seen in normal tissue was in the same focal plane but was smaller than blood vessels. Special stains identified the smaller structures in this network as lymphatics. CONCLUSIONS: Our limited series suggests that a negative confocal imaging study of the biliary tree can be used to rule out carcinoma, but there are frequent false positives using individual earlier published criteria. An abnormal reticular network, which may reflect changes in lymphatics, was never seen in benign strictures. Better correlation with known histologic structures may lead to improved accuracy of diagnoses.
Authors: Mario de Bellis; Stuart Sherman; Evan L Fogel; Harvey Cramer; John Chappo; Lee McHenry; James L Watkins; Glen A Lehman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Mario De Bellis; Stuart Sherman; Evan L Fogel; Harvey Cramer; John Chappo; Lee McHenry; James L Watkins; Glen A Lehman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: J Jailwala; E L Fogel; S Sherman; K Gottlieb; J Flueckiger; L G Bucksot; G A Lehman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Pei-Lin Hsiung; Pei-Lei Hsiung; Jonathan Hardy; Shai Friedland; Roy Soetikno; Christine B Du; Amy P Wu; Peyman Sahbaie; James M Crawford; Anson W Lowe; Christopher H Contag; Thomas D Wang Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-03-16 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Martin Goetz; Alex Ziebart; Sebastian Foersch; Michael Vieth; Maximilian J Waldner; Peter Delaney; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath; Ralf Kiesslich Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Alexander Meining; Eckart Frimberger; Valentin Becker; Stefan Von Delius; Claus Hann Von Weyhern; Roland M Schmid; Christian Prinz Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Ralf Kiesslich; Juergen Burg; Michael Vieth; Janina Gnaendiger; Meike Enders; Peter Delaney; Adrian Polglase; Wendy McLaren; Daniela Janell; Steven Thomas; Bernhard Nafe; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Fabrice Caillol; Erwan Bories; Flora Poizat; Christian Pesenti; Benjamin Esterni; Geneviève Monges; Marc Giovannini Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Michel Kahaleh; Marc Giovannini; Priya Jamidar; S Ian Gan; Paola Cesaro; Fabrice Caillol; Bernard Filoche; Kunal Karia; Ioana Smith; Monica Gaidhane; Adam Slivka Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 2.260