OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of switching to a second tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Data were extracted from an ongoing longitudinal observational multicentre study in Norway. This study included anti-TNF naïve patients with AS starting treatment with a TNFi as well as treatment with a second TNFi in these same patients. Effectiveness data and 2-year drug survival were compared between switchers and non-switchers and within switchers (first and second TNFi). RESULTS: 514 anti-TNF naïve patients with AS were included; 77 patients switched to a second TNFi while 437 patients did not switch. The percentages of non-switchers using etanercept, infliximab or adalimumab were 53%, 32% and 15%, and the percentages of first and second TNFi in the switchers were 42%, 53% and 5% and 40%, 23% and 36%, respectively. The reason for switching was insufficient response (IR) in 30, adverse events (AEs) in 44 and not reported in 3 patients. Baseline disease activity was similar between the groups. Three-month BASDAI 50 and ASAS 40 responses were achieved by 49% and 38% of non-switchers, by 25% and 30% of switchers after the first TNFi and by 28% and 31% after the second TNFi. The 3-month disease activity level was higher for switchers on the second TNFi than for non-switchers. Drug withdrawal rate was higher during the second TNFi among switchers than for non-switchers (p=0.001). No difference was found in the effectiveness of the second TNFi between switchers due to IR and AE. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that switching to a second TNFi can be effective in AS and can be as useful as in rheumatoid arthritis, although overall effectiveness seems to be somewhat lower than in non-switchers.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of switching to a second tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Data were extracted from an ongoing longitudinal observational multicentre study in Norway. This study included anti-TNF naïve patients with AS starting treatment with a TNFi as well as treatment with a second TNFi in these same patients. Effectiveness data and 2-year drug survival were compared between switchers and non-switchers and within switchers (first and second TNFi). RESULTS: 514 anti-TNF naïve patients with AS were included; 77 patients switched to a second TNFi while 437 patients did not switch. The percentages of non-switchers using etanercept, infliximab or adalimumab were 53%, 32% and 15%, and the percentages of first and second TNFi in the switchers were 42%, 53% and 5% and 40%, 23% and 36%, respectively. The reason for switching was insufficient response (IR) in 30, adverse events (AEs) in 44 and not reported in 3 patients. Baseline disease activity was similar between the groups. Three-month BASDAI 50 and ASAS 40 responses were achieved by 49% and 38% of non-switchers, by 25% and 30% of switchers after the first TNFi and by 28% and 31% after the second TNFi. The 3-month disease activity level was higher for switchers on the second TNFi than for non-switchers. Drug withdrawal rate was higher during the second TNFi among switchers than for non-switchers (p=0.001). No difference was found in the effectiveness of the second TNFi between switchers due to IR and AE. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that switching to a second TNFi can be effective in AS and can be as useful as in rheumatoid arthritis, although overall effectiveness seems to be somewhat lower than in non-switchers.
Authors: Rieke Alten; P G Conaghan; V Strand; E Sullivan; S Blackburn; H Tian; K Gandhi; S M Jugl; A Deodhar Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: U Kiltz; J Sieper; H Kellner; D Krause; M Rudwaleit; J-F Chenot; A Stallmach; S Jaresch; J Braun Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 1.372
Authors: Bárbara P Fafá; Paulo Louzada-Junior; David C Titton; Eliana Zandonade; Roberto Ranza; Ieda Laurindo; Paula Peçanha; Aline Ranzolin; André L Hayata; Angela Duarte; Inês G Silveira; Izaias Costa; José C Macieira; Luiz S Guedes-Barbosa; Manoel B Bertolo; Maria Fátima Lobato da C Sauma; Marília B G Silva; Marlene Freire; Morton A Scheinberg; Vander Fernandes; Washington Bianchi; José R S Miranda; Geraldo R C Pinheiro; Hellen M S Carvalho; Claiton Viegas Brenol; Ivanio A Pereira; Gláucio Ricardo Werner de Castro; Júlio C Bertacini de Morais; Sheila K F Oliveira; Mirhelen Mendes de Abreu; Roberto A Toledo; Marcelo M Pinheiro; Walber Pinto Vieira; Valéria Valim Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: U Kiltz; J Braun; A Becker; J-F Chenot; M Dreimann; L Hammel; A Heiligenhaus; K-G Hermann; R Klett; D Krause; K-F Kreitner; U Lange; A Lauterbach; W Mau; R Mössner; U Oberschelp; S Philipp; U Pleyer; M Rudwaleit; E Schneider; T L Schulte; J Sieper; A Stallmach; B Swoboda; M Winking Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.372