Literature DB >> 21062551

Selecting general practice specialty trainees: where next?

Bill Irish1, Fiona Patterson.   

Abstract

Selection into GP speciality training is based on results of a multi-method job analysis study. Six key competency domains were identified as priorities to assess through the current national selection process, including empathy, communication, integrity, clinical expertise, problem-solving, and resilience. Each applicant is assessed using clinical problem-solving and situational judgement machine marked tests, followed by high fidelity exercises at regional selection centres. These show good internal reliability and predictive validity, with high correlations with subsequent job performance and outcomes in the MRCGP examinations. Candidate feedback is generally positive, where candidates prefer multiple opportunities to demonstrate their aptitude. When comparing selection methods, candidates perceive high fidelity assessments (for example, a consultation exercise with a simulated patient) as the most job relevant and fair. Emerging data provides opportunities to both streamline and re-engineer the process, so as to optimise efficiency (including cost-effectiveness) while further developing its robustness. Logistic considerations favour delivery of multiple equated versions of machine marked tests in invigilated test centres. As with other assessments in medical education, concerns remain about differential performance between UK and international medical graduates. There is an urgent need to review the job analysis and selection criteria given profound changes in UK general practice taking place over the last decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21062551      PMCID: PMC2965970          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X538958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  6 in total

1.  Identifying critical success factors for designing selection processes into postgraduate specialty training: the case of UK general practice.

Authors:  Simon Plint; Fiona Patterson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  A new selection system to recruit general practice registrars: preliminary findings from a validation study.

Authors:  Fiona Patterson; Eamonn Ferguson; Tim Norfolk; Pat Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-26

Review 3.  Personnel selection.

Authors:  Paul R Sackett; Filip Lievens
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Evaluation of three short-listing methodologies for selection into postgraduate training in general practice.

Authors:  Fiona Patterson; Helen Baron; Victoria Carr; Simon Plint; Pat Lane
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 5.  Oral assessment and postgraduate medical examinations: establishing conditions for validity, reliability and fairness.

Authors:  Muhammed Ashraf Memon; Gordon Rowland Joughin; Breda Memon
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.853

6.  A competency model for general practice: implications for selection, training, and development.

Authors:  F Patterson; E Ferguson; P Lane; K Farrell; J Martlew; A Wells
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.386

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Strengthening general practice in deprived localities.

Authors:  Jacky Hayden
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The predictive validity of selection for entry into postgraduate training in general practice: evidence from three longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Fiona Patterson; Filip Lievens; Máire Kerrin; Neil Munro; Bill Irish
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Selecting GP speciality trainees: squaring the circle?

Authors:  Terry Kemple
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The UKCAT test: developments, research and its use by dental schools in the U.K.

Authors:  R McAndrew; R Greatrix
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  A new competency model for general practice: implications for selection, training, and careers.

Authors:  Fiona Patterson; Abdol Tavabie; MeiLing Denney; Máire Kerrin; Vicki Ashworth; Anna Koczwara; Sheona MacLeod
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.386

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.