Literature DB >> 21062549

Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences.

Vicki Tsianakas1, Michael Calnan, Karl Atkin, Elizabeth Dormandy, Theresa M Marteau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timely antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia (SC&T) screening for all women in primary care facilitates informed decision making, but little is known about its implementation. AIM: To assess the feasibility of offering antenatal SC&T screening in primary care at the time of pregnancy confirmation. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional investigation of GPs' beliefs and perceived practices.
METHOD: Informal face-to-face interviews with 34 GPs.
SETTING: Seventeen inner-city general practices that offered antenatal SC&T screening as part of a trial.
RESULTS: GPs identified both barriers and facilitators. Organisational barriers included inflexible appointment systems and lack of interpreters for women whose first language was not English. Professional barriers included concerns about raising possible adverse outcomes in the first antenatal visit. Perceived patient barriers included women's lack of awareness of SC&T. Hence, GPs presented the test to women as routine, rather than as a choice. Organisational facilitators included simple and flexible systems for offering screening in primary care, practice cohesion, and training. Professional facilitators included positive attitudes to screening for SC&T. Perceived patient facilitators included women's desire for healthy children.
CONCLUSION: GPs reported barriers, as well as facilitators, to successful implementation but the extent to which screening could be regarded as offering 'informed choice' remained fundamental when making sense of these barriers and facilitators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21062549      PMCID: PMC2965967          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X532602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  19 in total

1.  Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  R Grol; J Grimshaw
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1999-10

Review 2.  Building a framework for getting evidence into critical care education and practice.

Authors:  P Thomson; N J Angus; J Scott
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.072

3.  Low uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in minority ethnic groups and socially deprived groups: a reflection of women's attitudes or a failure to facilitate informed choices?

Authors:  Elizabeth Dormandy; Susan Michie; Richard Hooper; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  'Medicine's next goldmine?' The implications of new genetic health technologies for the health service.

Authors:  Michael Calnan; David Wainwright; Peter Glasner; Ruth Newbury-Ecob; Ewan Ferlie
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

5.  Audit of process of antenatal screening for sickle cell disorders at a north London hospital.

Authors:  H Neuenschwander; B Modell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-27

6.  A study of general practitioners' reasons for changing their prescribing behaviour.

Authors:  D Armstrong; H Reyburn; R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-13

7.  What constitutes 'balanced' information in the practitioners' portrayals of Down's syndrome?

Authors:  Clare Williams; Priscilla Alderson; Bobbie Farsides
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.372

8.  Antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care: a whole system participatory action research project.

Authors:  Paul Thomas; Lola Oni; Mabel Alli; Judith St Hilaire; Alma Smith; Conan Leavey; Ricky Banarsee
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  "You have to cover up the words of the doctor": the mediation of trust in interpreted consultations in primary care.

Authors:  Nadia Robb; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2006

10.  Prenatal testing: the perceptions and experiences of Muslim women in Australia.

Authors:  V Tsianakas; Pranee Liamputtong
Journal:  J Reprod Infant Psychol       Date:  2002-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Jumping (or being pushed) from maternity care.

Authors:  David Jewell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders: exploring the ethics.

Authors:  Zuzana Deans; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty; Celine Lewis
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of women's experiences and expectations of participation.

Authors:  Vicki Tsianakas; Karl Atkin; Michael W Calnan; Elizabeth Dormandy; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Health practitioners' perceptions of the barriers and enablers to the implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Best; Janet Long; Tahlia Theodorou; Sarah Hatem; Rebecca Lake; Alison Archibald; Lucinda Freeman; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Attitudes of general practitioners and midwives towards ethnicity-based haemoglobinopathy-carrier screening.

Authors:  Suze M P J Jans; Ank de Jonge; Lidewij Henneman; Martina C Cornel; Antoinette L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Preferences for prenatal diagnosis of sickle-cell disorder: A discrete choice experiment comparing potential service users and health-care providers.

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Eugene Oteng-Ntim; Frida Forya; Mary Petrou; Stephen Morris; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Experiences of a High-Risk Population with Prenatal Hemoglobinopathy Carrier Screening in a Primary Care Setting: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Kim C A Holtkamp; Phillis Lakeman; Hind Hader; Suze M J P Jans; Maria Hoenderdos; Henna A M Playfair; Martina C Cornel; Marjolein Peters; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.537

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.