Literature DB >> 21062180

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and volitional quadriceps activation.

Christopher E Gibbons1, Brian G Pietrosimone, Joseph M Hart, Susan A Saliba, Christopher D Ingersoll.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Quadriceps-activation deficits have been reported after meniscectomy. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in conjunction with maximal contractions affects quadriceps activation in patients after meniscectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of single-pulsed TMS on quadriceps central activation ratio (CAR) in patients after meniscectomy.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial.
SETTING: University laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twenty participants who had partial meniscectomy and who had a CAR less than 85% were assigned randomly to the TMS group (7 men, 4 women; age  =  38.1 ± 16.2 years, height  =  176.8 ± 11.5 cm, mass  =  91.8 ± 27.5 kg, postoperative time  =  36.7 ± 34.9 weeks) or the control group (7 men, 2 women; age  =  38.2 ± 17.5 years, height  =  176.5 ± 7.9 cm, mass  =  86.2 ± 15.3 kg, postoperative time  =  36.6 ± 37.4 weeks). INTERVENTION(S): Participants in the experimental group received TMS over the motor cortex that was contralateral to the involved leg and performed 3 maximal quadriceps contractions with the involved leg. The control group performed 3 maximal quadriceps contractions without the TMS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Quadriceps activation was assessed using the CAR, which was measured in 70° of knee flexion at baseline and at 0, 10, 30, and 60 minutes posttest. The CAR was expressed as a percentage of full activation.
RESULTS: Differences in CAR were detected over time (F(4,72)  =  3.025, P  = .02). No interaction (F(4,72)  =  1.457, P  =  .22) or between-groups differences (F(1,18)  =  0.096, P  =  .76) were found for CAR. Moderate CAR effect sizes were found at 10 (Cohen d  =  0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]  =  -0.33, 1.37) and 60 (Cohen d  =  0.50, 95% CI  =  -0.37, 1.33) minutes in the TMS group compared with CAR at baseline. Strong effect sizes were found for CAR at 10 (Cohen d  =  0.82, 95% CI  =  -0.13, 1.7) and 60 (Cohen d  =  1.06, 95% CI  =  0.08, 1.95) minutes in the TMS group when comparing percentage change scores between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: No differences in CAR were found between groups at selected points within a 60-minute time frame, yet moderate to strong effect sizes for CAR were found at 10 and 60 minutes in the TMS group, indicating increased activation after TMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21062180      PMCID: PMC2978008          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.6.570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  40 in total

1.  Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on results of the twitch interpolation technique.

Authors:  D Urbach; F Awiszus
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  The effects of joint damage on muscle function, proprioception and rehabilitation.

Authors:  M. V. Hurley
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  1997-02

4.  Strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle and functional recovery after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; A Delitto; S L Bailey; S W Stralka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Quadriceps inhibition after repetitive lumbar extension exercise in persons with a history of low back pain.

Authors:  Joseph M Hart; Julie M Fritz; D Casey Kerrigan; Ethan N Saliba; Bruce M Gansneder; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Quantitation of central activation failure during maximal voluntary contractions in humans.

Authors:  J A Kent-Braun; R Le Blanc
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Reflex inhibition of the quadriceps femoris muscle after injury or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; P F De Luca; P R Williams; M E Eastlack; A R Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty. The contributions of muscle atrophy and failure of voluntary muscle activation.

Authors:  Ryan L Mizner; Stephanie C Petterson; Jennifer E Stevens; Krista Vandenborne; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Neuromuscular quadriceps dysfunction prior to osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Alexander Berth; Markus Nehring; Friedemann Awiszus
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Mechanisms underlying quadriceps weakness in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Stephanie C Petterson; Peter Barrance; Thomas Buchanan; Stuart Binder-Macleod; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  12 in total

1.  Neural Excitability Alterations After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian G Pietrosimone; Adam S Lepley; Hayley M Ericksen; Amy Clements; David H Sohn; Phillip A Gribble
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Persistent neuromuscular and corticomotor quadriceps asymmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher M Kuenze; Jay Hertel; Arthur Weltman; David Diduch; Susan A Saliba; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Central Nervous System Adaptation After Ligamentous Injury: a Summary of Theories, Evidence, and Clinical Interpretation.

Authors:  Alan R Needle; Adam S Lepley; Dustin R Grooms
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Corticospinal and intracortical excitability of the quadriceps in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Andrew J Kittelson; Abbey C Thomas; Benzi M Kluger; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Disinhibitory interventions and voluntary quadriceps activation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew S Harkey; Phillip A Gribble; Brian G Pietrosimone
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Chronic ankle instability and corticomotor excitability of the fibularis longus muscle.

Authors:  Brian G Pietrosimone; Phillip A Gribble
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  A theoretical framework for understanding neuromuscular response to lower extremity joint injury.

Authors:  Brian G Pietrosimone; Michelle M McLeod; Adam S Lepley
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Benefits of using transcranial magnetic stimulation as a tool to facilitate the chronic knee injury rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jae-Moo Lee; Ji-Hang Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-04-20

9.  Neurophysiological correlates of motor planning and movement initiation in ACL-reconstructed individuals: a case-control study.

Authors:  Florian Giesche; Tobias Engeroff; Jan Wilke; Daniel Niederer; Lutz Vogt; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Resting and active motor thresholds versus stimulus-response curves to determine transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity in quadriceps femoris.

Authors:  John Temesi; Mathieu Gruet; Thomas Rupp; Samuel Verges; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.