Literature DB >> 2106218

Differentiation of seminomatous from nonseminomatous testicular tumors with MR imaging.

J O Johnson1, R F Mattrey, J Phillipson.   

Abstract

Distinguishing seminomatous from nonseminomatous testicular neoplasms preoperatively is useful because treatment of these two tumors types is different. We evaluated whether the distinction could be made with MR imaging in six patients with seminomatous and nine patients with nonseminomatous testicular tumors (including teratoma, teratocarcinoma, embryonal cell, and choriocarcinoma). The MR diagnoses, which were obtained from the formal reports of the MR studies done and interpreted before orchiectomy, were compared with the pathologic diagnosis. The distinction between the two tumor types on MR images was based on the signal intensity and heterogeneity of the lesion. We also retrospectively compared the MR findings with tissue histology. MR scans in nonseminomatous tumors showed a marked heterogeneous mix of signals, with some regions less intense and others more intense than normal testicular tissue on both proton-density and T2-weighted images. The typical background signal was nearly equal to normal testicular tissue. The tumors also had a dark band at their periphery that correlated with a fibrous tumor capsule on histologic examination. In contradistinction, seminomatous tumors were isointense with testis on proton-density images and consistently hypointense and relatively homogeneous on T2-weighted images. These tumors typically lacked a capsule on MR images. One lesion, only 3 mm in diameter, could not be characterized on MR images because of limitations in spatial and contrast resolution. In 13 of the 14 lesions that could be characterized, the histologic type was predicted correctly on the basis of the MR appearance. The one error occurred in a patient with pure seminoma. Although the MR appearance of the lesion was otherwise similar to the other seminomas, the lesion had a single focus of bright signal that was due to hemorrhage. This focus was interpreted incorrectly as a nonseminomatous element. Our findings in this small series of patients suggest that MR imaging can be used to distinguish seminomatous from nonseminomatous testicular tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2106218     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.154.3.2106218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  14 in total

1.  Diagnosis of a primary testicular lymphoma by echography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Alejandro Vara Castrodeza; Angeles Torres Nieto; Marcelino Mendo González; Antonio Rodríguez Toves; María Jesús Peñarrubia Ponce; Miguel Angel de la Fuente Bobillo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  MRI of the scrotum: Recommendations of the ESUR Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group.

Authors:  Athina C Tsili; Michele Bertolotto; Ahmet Tuncay Turgut; Vikram Dogra; Simon Freeman; Laurence Rocher; Jane Belfield; Michal Studniarek; Alexandra Ntorkou; Lorenzo E Derchi; Raymond Oyen; Parvati Ramchandani; Mustafa Secil; Jonathan Richenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of normal and abnormal scrotum: preliminary results.

Authors:  Athina C Tsili; Maria I Argyropoulou; Dimitrios Giannakis; Stavros Tsampalas; Nikolaos Sofikitis; Konstantinos Tsampoulas
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Optimized imaging techniques for testicular masses: fast and with high accuracy.

Authors:  Guner Sonmez; Ali Kemal Sivrioglu; Murat Velioglu; Mehmet Incedayi; Hasan Soydan; Kemal Kara; Ferhat Ateş; Muzaffer Saglam
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Instead of some other medical specialty. Tulk balances art and medicine.

Authors:  P Harrison
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  PET/Computed Tomography in Renal, Bladder, and Testicular Cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten Bouchelouche; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-04-24

7.  Clinical and ultrasound features of segmental testicular infarction: six-year experience from a single centre.

Authors:  Praveen Bilagi; Seshadri Sriprasad; Jane L Clarke; Maria E Sellars; Gordon H Muir; Paul S Sidhu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Testicular Seminoma and Its Mimics: From the Radiologic Pathology Archives.

Authors:  Jamie Marko; Darcy J Wolfman; Alex L Aubin; Isabell A Sesterhenn
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Imaging of testicular germ cell tumours.

Authors:  P U Dalal; S A Sohaib; R Huddart
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Advantage of Adding Diffusion Weighted Imaging to Routine MRI Examinations in the Diagnostics of Scrotal Lesions.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohamed Algebally; Hazim Ibrahim Tantawy; Reda Ramadan Hussein Yousef; Wojciech Szmigielski; Adham Darweesh
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.