Literature DB >> 21061982

Monitoring for resistance to organophosphorus and pyrethroid insecticides in Varroa mite populations.

Lambert H B Kanga1, John Adamczyk, Keith Marshall, Robert Cox.   

Abstract

The occurrence of resistance in Varroa mite populations is a serious threat to the beekeeping industry and to crops that rely on the honey bee for pollination. Integrated pest management strategies for control of this pest include the judicious use of insecticides. To monitor field populations of Varroa mite for insecticide resistance, a glass vial bioassay procedure was developed to use in the development of a resistance management strategy. Diagnostic concentrations needed to separate susceptible genotypes from resistant individuals were determined for cypermethrin (0.1 microg per vial), fluvalinate (5.0 microg per vial), malathion (0.01 microg per vial), coumaphos (10.0 microg per vial), diazinon (5.0 microg per vial), methomyl (0.5 microg per vial), propoxur (0.1 microg per vial), and endosulfan (2.5 microg per vial). Resistance to organophosphorus insecticides (malathion, coumaphos) and pyrethroids (cypermetrhrin, fluvalinate) was widespread in both La Media Ranch, TX, and Wewahitchka, FL, from 2007 to 2009. There was no resistance to endosulfan, diazinon, methomyl, and propoxur in field populations of Varroa mite in the two locations where resistance was monitored. The seasonal patterns of resistance in Wewahitchka were different from those of La Media Ranch. In the former location, the frequency of resistance to all insecticides tested decreased significantly from 2007 to 2009, whereas it increased in the latter location. Resistance levels were unstable, suggesting that resistance could be successfully managed. The results validate use of the glass vial bioassay to monitor for resistance in Varroa mite and provide the basis for the development of a resistance management strategy designed to extend the efficacy of all classes of insecticides used for control of Varroa mite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21061982     DOI: 10.1603/ec10064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of tau-fluvalinate, acrinathrin, and amitraz effects on susceptible and resistant populations of Varroa destructor in a vial test.

Authors:  Martin Kamler; Marta Nesvorna; Jitka Stara; Tomas Erban; Jan Hubert
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Control of Varroa Destructor in Kazakhstan.

Authors:  A Allabergenova; G Turganbayeva; M Nurseitova
Journal:  Arch Razi Inst       Date:  2021-11-30

3.  Miticidal activity of fenazaquin and fenpyroximate against Varroa destructor, an ectoparasite of Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Rassol Bahreini; Medhat Nasr; Cassandra Docherty; Samantha Muirhead; Olivia de Herdt; David Feindel
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 4.462

4.  Efficacy assessment of soft and hard acaricides against Varroa destructor mite infesting honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, through sugar roll method.

Authors:  Zul Norain Sajid; Muhammad Asif Aziz; Imran Bodlah; Rashid Mehmood Rana; Hamed A Ghramh; Khalid Ali Khan
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Evaluation of potential miticide toxicity to Varroa destructor and honey bees, Apis mellifera, under laboratory conditions.

Authors:  Rassol Bahreini; Medhat Nasr; Cassandra Docherty; Olivia de Herdt; Samantha Muirhead; David Feindel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.