Literature DB >> 21061876

Evidence-based medicine and levels of evidence.

David K Wallace1.   

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine is the practice of making medical decisions based on evidence gained from applying the scientific method. Published studies are evaluated using three key questions: "Are the results valid?"; "What are the results?"; and "Can the results be applied to my patients?" The hierarchy of study methods for obtaining evidence is, in order from least to most useful: laboratory research, editorials, case reports and series, case-control studies, cohort studies, and randomized clinical trials. Retrospective case series can suffer from problems such as selection of a biased sample, mixing of treatment effects, and lack of control group. Randomized clinical trials (and meta-analyses of multiple trials) provide the highest level of evidence because randomization limits confounding and prevents bias of treatment assignment. In addition, randomized trials have standardization of interventions, prospective data collection, and masked outcome measures. Although every question cannot be addressed by a randomized clinical trial, the best available evidence should be sought and used to guide treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21061876     DOI: 10.3368/aoj.60.1.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Orthopt J        ISSN: 0065-955X


  5 in total

1.  Comments on "Sensory Outcomes in Digital Nerve Repair Techniques: An Updated Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review".

Authors:  James J Drinane; Darren E Gemoets; Malcolm Z Roth
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-09-16

2.  A manual corpus of annotated main findings of clinical case reports.

Authors:  Neil R Smalheiser; Mengqi Luo; Sidharth Addepalli; Xiaokai Cui
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Need for discriminating between diagnostic and screening efficacy to estimate a biomarker based on case control and cohort studies.

Authors:  Liu Hui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Analyzing the Relationship between Cohort and Case-Control Study Results Based on Model for Multiple Pathogenic Factors.

Authors:  Hui Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 5.  Safety and efficacy of en bloc transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection for primary nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dong Zhang; Lifeng Yao; Sui Yu; Yue Cheng; Junhui Jiang; Qi Ma; Zejun Yan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.