PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of the addition of atropine to exercise testing in patients who failed to achieve their target heart rate (HR) during stress myocardial perfusion imaging withsingle-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS: The study was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled design. Patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease who failed to achieve a target HR (≥85% of maximal predicted HR) during exercise SPECT imaging were randomized to receive intravenous atropine (n=100) or placebo (n=101). RESULTS: The two groups of patients did not differ with respect to demographic or clinical characteristics. A higher proportion of patients in the atropine group achieved the target HR compared to the placebo group (60% versus 3%, p<0.0001). SPECT imaging was abnormal in a higher proportion of patients in the atropine group as compared to the placebo group (57% versus 42%, p<0.05). Stress-induced myocardial ischaemia was present in more patients in the atropine group as compared to placebo (47% versus 29%, p<0.01). In both groups of patients, no major side effects occurred. CONCLUSION: The addition of atropine at the end of exercise testing is more effective than placebo in raising HR to adequate levels, without additional risks of complications. The use of atropine in patients who initially failed to achieve their maximal predicted HR is associated with a higher probability of achieving a diagnostic myocardial perfusion study.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of the addition of atropine to exercise testing in patients who failed to achieve their target heart rate (HR) during stress myocardial perfusion imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS: The study was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled design. Patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease who failed to achieve a target HR (≥85% of maximal predicted HR) during exercise SPECT imaging were randomized to receive intravenous atropine (n=100) or placebo (n=101). RESULTS: The two groups of patients did not differ with respect to demographic or clinical characteristics. A higher proportion of patients in the atropine group achieved the target HR compared to the placebo group (60% versus 3%, p<0.0001). SPECT imaging was abnormal in a higher proportion of patients in the atropine group as compared to the placebo group (57% versus 42%, p<0.05). Stress-induced myocardial ischaemia was present in more patients in the atropine group as compared to placebo (47% versus 29%, p<0.01). In both groups of patients, no major side effects occurred. CONCLUSION: The addition of atropine at the end of exercise testing is more effective than placebo in raising HR to adequate levels, without additional risks of complications. The use of atropine in patients who initially failed to achieve their maximal predicted HR is associated with a higher probability of achieving a diagnostic myocardial perfusion study.
Authors: M L Ladenheim; B H Pollock; A Rozanski; D S Berman; H M Staniloff; J S Forrester; G A Diamond Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1986-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M L Geleijnse; A Elhendy; R T van Domburg; J H Cornel; R Rambaldi; A Salustri; A E Reijs; J R Roelandt; P M Fioretti Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-07-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-02-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Sitges; C Paré; M Azqueta; X Bosch; F Miranda-Guardiola; M Velamazán; J Magriñá; G Sanz Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: T Sharir; B Rabinowitz; S Livschitz; I Moalem; J Baron; E Kaplinsky; P Chouraqui Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: P R McLaughlin; R P Martin; P Doherty; S Daspit; M Goris; W Haskell; S Lewis; J P Kriss; D C Harrison Journal: Circulation Date: 1977-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D S Berman; H Kiat; J D Friedman; F P Wang; K van Train; L Matzer; J Maddahi; G Germano Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andrea De Lorenzo; James Foerster; Maria G Sciammarella; Cathy Suey; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sara L Partington; Viswanatha Lanka; Jon Hainer; Ron Blankstein; Hicham Skali; Daniel E Forman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 5.952