Literature DB >> 21060072

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes intended for reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial subgroup analysis.

Philippe Gabriel Steg1, Stefan James, Robert A Harrington, Diego Ardissino, Richard C Becker, Christopher P Cannon, Håkan Emanuelsson, Ariel Finkelstein, Steen Husted, Hugo Katus, Jan Kilhamn, Sylvia Olofsson, Robert F Storey, W Douglas Weaver, Lars Wallentin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aspirin and clopidogrel are recommended for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or undergoing coronary stenting. Ticagrelor, a reversible oral P2Y12-receptor antagonist, provides faster, greater, and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel and may be useful for patients with acute ST-segment elevation (STE) ACS and planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULT: Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO), a randomized, double-blind trial, compared ticagrelor with clopidogrel for the prevention of vascular events in 18 624 ACS patients. This report concerns the 7544 ACS patients with STE or left bundle-branch block allocated to either ticagrelor 180-mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose (with provision for 300 mg clopidogrel at percutaneous coronary intervention) followed by 75 mg daily for 6 to 12 months. The reduction of the primary end point (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (10.8% versus 9.4%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.01; P=0.07) was consistent with the overall PLATO results. There was no interaction between presentation with STE/left bundle-branch block and randomized treatment (interaction P=0.29). Ticagrelor reduced several secondary end points, including myocardial infarction alone (HR, 0.80; P=0.03), total mortality (HR, 0.82; P=0.05), and definite stent thrombosis (HR, 0.66; P=0.03). The risk of stroke, low in both groups, was higher with ticagrelor (1.7% versus 1.0%; HR,1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.48; P=0.02). Ticagrelor did not affect major bleeding (HR, 0.98; P=0.76).
CONCLUSION: In patients with STE-ACS and planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the effects of ticagrelor were consistent with those observed in the overall PLATO trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21060072     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.927582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  98 in total

Review 1.  Optimization of Antiplatelet Therapy in STEMI.

Authors:  Abhishek Sinha; Kush Agrawal; Rahul Sakhuja
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-08

Review 2.  New antithrombotic drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Weitz; John W Eikelboom; Meyer Michel Samama
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Which antiplatelet agent for whom? Which patient populations benefit most from novel antiplatelet agents (ticagrelor, prasugrel)?

Authors:  Christoph Varenhorst; Stefan James
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  The evolution of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Omair Yousuf; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Pre PCI hospital antithrombotic therapy for ST elevation myocardial infarction: striving for consensus.

Authors:  S Michael Gharacholou; Brenda J Larson; Christian C Zuver; Ryan J Wubben; Giorgio Gimelli; Amish N Raval
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Prevalence of contraindications and conditions for precaution for prasugrel administration in a real world acute coronary syndrome population.

Authors:  Dimitrios Alexopoulos; Ioanna Xanthopoulou; Panagiota Mylona; Angelos Perperis; Aggeliki Panagiotou; Gerasimos Dimitropoulos; Grigorios Tsigkas; George Hahalis; Periklis Davlouros
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  The P2Y(12) receptor as a target of antithrombotic drugs.

Authors:  Stephen O'Connor; Gilles Montalescot; Jean-Philippe Collet
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.765

8.  A prospective randomized evaluation of a pharmacogenomic approach to antiplatelet therapy among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the RAPID STEMI study.

Authors:  D Y F So; G A Wells; R McPherson; M Labinaz; M R Le May; C Glover; A J Dick; M Froeschl; J-F Marquis; M H Gollob; L Tran; J Bernick; B Hibbert; J D Roberts
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 9.  [Antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. Therapeutic strategies and treatment duration].

Authors:  C B Olivier; P Diehl; C Bode; M Moser
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Neprilysin levels at the acute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Hugo Bernelin; Nathan Mewton; Salim Si-Mohamed; Pierre Croisille; Gilles Rioufol; Eric Bonnefoy-Cudraz; Philippe Douek; Nathalie Dufay; Camille Amaz; Claire Jossan; Michel Ovize; Thomas Bochaton
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.