PURPOSE: The role of TP53 mutations in the tumorigenesis of sporadic medulloblastoma (MB) and the value of TP53 mutation status as a prognostic marker are not yet definitely elucidated. A recent report identified TP53 mutations in MB as an adverse prognostic marker. Hence, the current study was conducted to validate the prognostic role of TP53 mutation in MB and to understand its contribution to tumorigenesis. METHODS: A comprehensive genetic analysis of 310 MB samples was performed by screening for TP53 mutations and further relating the TP53 mutation status to p53 immunostaining, cytogenetic aberrations, and clinical variables. RESULTS: Mutation analysis of TP53 revealed mutations in 21 (6.8%) of 310 samples. Germline TP53 mutations were found in two patients with a history suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome. TP53 mutation status was not associated with unfavorable prognosis (P = .63) and was not linked to 17p allelic loss but was over-represented in the prognostically favorable WNT subgroup of MB as defined by CTNNB1 mutation (seven of 35 TP53-mutated tumors v 14 of 271 TP53 wild-type tumors; P = .005) and in tumors carrying high-level MYCN amplification (seven of 21 TP53-mutated tumors v 14 of 282 TP53 wild-type tumors; P = .001). CONCLUSION: The contradictory results in the recent literature concerning the prognostic value of TP53 mutation might be explained by different frequencies of WNT MBs, different frequencies of patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, and different cumulative doses of alkylating drugs applied in these studies.
PURPOSE: The role of TP53 mutations in the tumorigenesis of sporadic medulloblastoma (MB) and the value of TP53 mutation status as a prognostic marker are not yet definitely elucidated. A recent report identified TP53 mutations in MB as an adverse prognostic marker. Hence, the current study was conducted to validate the prognostic role of TP53 mutation in MB and to understand its contribution to tumorigenesis. METHODS: A comprehensive genetic analysis of 310 MB samples was performed by screening for TP53 mutations and further relating the TP53 mutation status to p53 immunostaining, cytogenetic aberrations, and clinical variables. RESULTS: Mutation analysis of TP53 revealed mutations in 21 (6.8%) of 310 samples. Germline TP53 mutations were found in two patients with a history suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome. TP53 mutation status was not associated with unfavorable prognosis (P = .63) and was not linked to 17p allelic loss but was over-represented in the prognostically favorable WNT subgroup of MB as defined by CTNNB1 mutation (seven of 35 TP53-mutated tumors v 14 of 271 TP53 wild-type tumors; P = .005) and in tumors carrying high-level MYCN amplification (seven of 21 TP53-mutated tumors v 14 of 282 TP53 wild-type tumors; P = .001). CONCLUSION: The contradictory results in the recent literature concerning the prognostic value of TP53 mutation might be explained by different frequencies of WNT MBs, different frequencies of patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, and different cumulative doses of alkylating drugs applied in these studies.
Authors: Sachiko Ohshima-Hosoyama; Monika A Davare; Suresh I Prajapati; Jinu Abraham; Sangeet Lal; Laura D Nelon; Aoife Kilcoyne; Francis J Giles; Martha A Hanes; Brian P Rubin; Charles Keller Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Annette Künkele; Katleen De Preter; Lukas Heukamp; Theresa Thor; Kristian W Pajtler; Wolfgang Hartmann; Michel Mittelbronn; Michael A Grotzer; Hedwig E Deubzer; Frank Speleman; Alexander Schramm; Angelika Eggert; Johannes H Schulte Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Jasmine Lau; Christin Schmidt; Shirley L Markant; Michael D Taylor; Robert J Wechsler-Reya; William A Weiss Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Tobias Rausch; David T W Jones; Marc Zapatka; Adrian M Stütz; Thomas Zichner; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Natalie Jäger; Marc Remke; David Shih; Paul A Northcott; Elke Pfaff; Jelena Tica; Qi Wang; Luca Massimi; Hendrik Witt; Sebastian Bender; Sabrina Pleier; Huriye Cin; Cynthia Hawkins; Christian Beck; Andreas von Deimling; Volkmar Hans; Benedikt Brors; Roland Eils; Wolfram Scheurlen; Jonathon Blake; Vladimir Benes; Andreas E Kulozik; Olaf Witt; Dianna Martin; Cindy Zhang; Rinnat Porat; Diana M Merino; Jonathan Wasserman; Nada Jabado; Adam Fontebasso; Lars Bullinger; Frank G Rücker; Konstanze Döhner; Hartmut Döhner; Jan Koster; Jan J Molenaar; Rogier Versteeg; Marcel Kool; Uri Tabori; David Malkin; Andrey Korshunov; Michael D Taylor; Peter Lichter; Stefan M Pfister; Jan O Korbel Journal: Cell Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Till Milde; Marco Lodrini; Larissa Savelyeva; Andrey Korshunov; Marcel Kool; Lena M Brueckner; André S L M Antunes; Ina Oehme; Arnulf Pekrun; Stefan M Pfister; Andreas E Kulozik; Olaf Witt; Hedwig E Deubzer Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2012-10-06 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Raimundo M Carvalho; Giovanny R Pinto; France K N Yoshioka; Patrícia D L Lima; Carolina R T Souza; Adriana C Guimarães; Letícia M Lamarão; Juan A Rey; Rommel R Burbano Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Marc Remke; Esther Hering; Nicolas U Gerber; Marcel Kool; Dominik Sturm; Christian H Rickert; Joachim Gerß; Stefan Schulz; Thomas Hielscher; Martin Hasselblatt; Astrid Jeibmann; Volkmar Hans; Vijay Ramaswamy; Michael D Taylor; Torsten Pietsch; Stefan Rutkowski; Andrey Korshunov; Carmelia-Maria Monoranu; Michael C Frühwald Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 1.475