Literature DB >> 21059603

Rapid innovation in ChIP-seq peak-calling algorithms is outdistancing benchmarking efforts.

Adam M Szalkowski1, Christoph D Schmid.   

Abstract

The current understanding of the regulation of transcription does not keep the pace with the spectacular advances in the determination of genomic sequences. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by massively parallel sequencing (ChIP-seq) promises to give better insight into transcription regulation by locating sites of protein-DNA interactions. Such loci of putative interactions can be inferred from the genome-wide distributions of ChIP-seq data by peak-calling software. The analysis of ChIP-seq data critically depends on this step and a multitude of these peak-callers have been deployed in the recent years. A recent study reported severe variation among peak-calling results. Yet, peak-calling still lacks systematic quantitative benchmarking. Here, we summarize benchmarking efforts and explain potential drawbacks of each benchmarking method.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21059603     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbq068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  23 in total

1.  ChIP-Seq: technical considerations for obtaining high-quality data.

Authors:  Benjamin L Kidder; Gangqing Hu; Keji Zhao
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Retrieving Chromatin Patterns from Deep Sequencing Data Using Correlation Functions.

Authors:  Jana Molitor; Jan-Philipp Mallm; Karsten Rippe; Fabian Erdel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding.

Authors:  Karl Kornacker; Morten Beck Rye; Tony Håndstad; Finn Drabløs
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Genome-wide bovine H3K27me3 modifications and the regulatory effects on genes expressions in peripheral blood lymphocytes.

Authors:  Yanghua He; Ying Yu; Yuan Zhang; Jiuzhou Song; Apratim Mitra; Yi Zhang; Yachun Wang; Dongxiao Sun; Shengli Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Motif discovery and transcription factor binding sites before and after the next-generation sequencing era.

Authors:  Federico Zambelli; Graziano Pesole; Giulio Pavesi
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Improving ChIP-seq peak-calling for functional co-regulator binding by integrating multiple sources of biological information.

Authors:  Hatice Ulku Osmanbeyoglu; Ryan J Hartmaier; Steffi Oesterreich; Xinghua Lu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  An integrated pipeline for the genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding sites from ChIP-Seq.

Authors:  Eloi Mercier; Arnaud Droit; Leping Li; Gordon Robertson; Xuekui Zhang; Raphael Gottardo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  VDA, a method of choosing a better algorithm with fewer validations.

Authors:  Francesco Strino; Fabio Parisi; Yuval Kluger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  diffReps: detecting differential chromatin modification sites from ChIP-seq data with biological replicates.

Authors:  Li Shen; Ning-Yi Shao; Xiaochuan Liu; Ian Maze; Jian Feng; Eric J Nestler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bioinformatic Analysis for Profiling Drug-induced Chromatin Modification Landscapes in Mouse Brain Using ChlP-seq Data.

Authors:  Yong-Hwee Eddie Loh; Jian Feng; Eric Nestler; Li Shen
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2017-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.