Literature DB >> 21059473

DSM bereavement exclusion for major depression and objective cognitive impairment.

Emmanuelle Corruble1, Bruno Falissard, Philip Gorwood.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The bereavement exclusion criterion for DSM major depressive episodes (MDE) has been challenged regarding symptom severity. This study aimed at assessing objective cognitive impairment, reflecting hippocampal function, in patients excluded from the diagnosis of major depression because of the bereavement exclusion. We expected that the bereavement excluded (BE) individuals would have less objective cognitive impairment than matched MDE patients.
METHODS: 1138 individuals seeking treatment and meeting all DSM MDE criteria except the bereavement exclusion criterion (BE group) were matched for age, gender, educational level and the number of past MDE with 1138 MDE patients (MDE group). They were compared for the delayed paragraph recall index from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised at baseline and 6-week follow-up.
RESULTS: The BE and MDE groups were not different in terms of immediate and delayed recall at baseline and follow-up. In both groups, multiple regression analyses showed that the number of correct answers of delayed recall at follow-up was not correlated with the HAD depression score but was correlated with the number of past major depressive episodes.
CONCLUSIONS: Instead of identifying subjects with less cognitive impairment, the bereavement exclusion selected subjects with similar cognitive impairment than MDE patients and similar neurotoxic effect on the hippocampus. The DSM bereavement exclusion for MDE is inadequate according to objective cognitive impairment, at least in this sample of individuals seeking treatment for depressive symptoms. Bereavement, just as any stressful event, could be quoted, but without interfering in the definition of major depressive episodes.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21059473     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  4 in total

1.  Fallacious reasoning in the argument to eliminate the major depression bereavement exclusion in DSM-5.

Authors:  Jerome Wakefield; Michael First
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  The bereavement exclusion may not be applicable in real world settings.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Corruble
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Validity of the bereavement exclusion to major depression: does the empirical evidence support the proposal to eliminate the exclusion in DSM-5?

Authors:  Jerome C Wakefield; Michael B First
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Distinguishing Bereavement from Depression in DSM-5: Evidence from Longitudinal Epidemiologic Surveys.

Authors:  Diana Paksarian; Ramin Mojtabai
Journal:  Psychiatr Ann       Date:  2013-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.