AIM: This exploratory study sought to examine the relationships among occupational status, menthol smoking preference and employer-sponsored smoking cessation programs and policies on quitting behaviors. DESIGN: Data for this cross-sectional study were obtained from the 2006 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS CPS), a large national survey representative of the civilian population, containing approximately 240,000 respondents. The total sample for the current study was 30,176. MEASUREMENTS: The TUS CPS regularly collects data on cigarette prevalence, quitting behaviors, smoking history and consumption patterns. We performed a logistic regression with 'life-time quitting smoking for 1 day or longer because they were trying to quit' as outcome variable. Independent variables included type of occupation, employer-sponsored cessation programs and policies and menthol status. FINDINGS: When controlling for occupational status and work-place policies, there were no differences for menthol versus non-menthol smokers on quitting behaviors [odds ratio (OR) = 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83, 1.15]. Service workers were less likely to quit compared with white-collar workers (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.69, 0.94), and those with no employer-sponsored cessation program were less likely to quit (OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.60, 0.83). White-collar workers, compared with blue-collar and service workers, were more likely to have a smoking policy in the work area (93% versus 86% versus 88%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: When occupational status and work-place smoking policies are controlled for, smokers of menthol cigarettes in the United States appear to have similar self-reported life-time rates of attempts to stop smoking to non-menthol smokers.
AIM: This exploratory study sought to examine the relationships among occupational status, menthol smoking preference and employer-sponsored smoking cessation programs and policies on quitting behaviors. DESIGN: Data for this cross-sectional study were obtained from the 2006 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS CPS), a large national survey representative of the civilian population, containing approximately 240,000 respondents. The total sample for the current study was 30,176. MEASUREMENTS: The TUS CPS regularly collects data on cigarette prevalence, quitting behaviors, smoking history and consumption patterns. We performed a logistic regression with 'life-time quitting smoking for 1 day or longer because they were trying to quit' as outcome variable. Independent variables included type of occupation, employer-sponsored cessation programs and policies and menthol status. FINDINGS: When controlling for occupational status and work-place policies, there were no differences for menthol versus non-menthol smokers on quitting behaviors [odds ratio (OR) = 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83, 1.15]. Service workers were less likely to quit compared with white-collar workers (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.69, 0.94), and those with no employer-sponsored cessation program were less likely to quit (OR = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.60, 0.83). White-collar workers, compared with blue-collar and service workers, were more likely to have a smoking policy in the work area (93% versus 86% versus 88%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: When occupational status and work-place smoking policies are controlled for, smokers of menthol cigarettes in the United States appear to have similar self-reported life-time rates of attempts to stop smoking to non-menthol smokers.
Authors: Babalola Faseru; Won S Choi; Ron Krebill; Matthew S Mayo; Nicole L Nollen; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Lisa Sanderson Cox Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Theresa M Winhusen; Bryon Adinoff; Daniel F Lewis; Gregory S Brigham; John G Gardin; Susan C Sonne; Jeff Theobald; Udi Ghitza Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jessica M Rath; Andrea C Villanti; Valerie F Williams; Amanda Richardson; Jennifer L Pearson; Donna M Vallone Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Babalola Faseru; Nicole L Nollen; Matthew S Mayo; Ron Krebill; Won S Choi; Neal L Benowitz; Rachel F Tyndale; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Lisa Sanderson Cox Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Lorraine R Reitzel; Yisheng Li; Diana W Stewart; Yumei Cao; David W Wetter; Andrew J Waters; Jennifer I Vidrine Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jennifer W Kahende; Ann M Malarcher; Anna Teplinskaya; Kat J Asman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Lauren K Collins; Raymond S Niaura; Stacey Y Gagosian; David B Abrams Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Francine Laden; Yueh-Hsiu Chiu; Eric Garshick; S Katharine Hammond; Jaime E Hart Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 3.295