Literature DB >> 21059041

Heel movement in horses: comparison between glued and nailed horse shoes at different speeds.

E Yoshihara1, T Takahashi, N Otsuka, T Isayama, T Tomiyama, A Hiraga, S Wada.   

Abstract

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: It has been suggested that the heel of the horse's hoof expands in the stance phase and this reduces the concussion at impact and helps pump blood into the hoof. Therefore, farriers usually leave a gap in the heel region when using the traditional nailed shoe. Recently glued shoes which are attached firmly to the heel have been developed and these could restrict heel movement.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of mediolateral heel movement between glued and nailed shoes.
METHODS: Seven Thoroughbreds were used. Either their fore- or hind hooves were shod with plain aluminium shoes, attached first with glue and later with nails. Measurements were collected continuously with a displacement sensor fixed between the medial and lateral hoof walls at the heel. The horses ran on a treadmill at a walk (1.8 m/s), trot (3.5 m/s), canter (8 m/s) and gallop (12 m/s). The mediolateral heel movement in a nonweightbearing position was set at zero for each hoof and thus positive and negative numbers represented expansion and contraction, respectively. Average values of 10 consecutive strides at each speed were compared between the 2 shoeing methods by paired t test.
RESULTS: At all running speeds, the heels expanded in the first 70-80% of the stance phase and contracted at breakover. The total heel movement calculated as the sum of the maximum expansion and contraction value was less with glued shoeing than with nailed shoeing for walking (all limbs), trotting (all limbs), cantering (leading forelimb and both hindlimbs) and galloping (both hindlimbs).
CONCLUSIONS: Glueing restricted heel movement, suggesting possible interference with shock absorption and blood pumping in the hoof. Further study is needed to evaluate the influence of glued shoeing on hoof mechanics.
© 2010 EVJ Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21059041     DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00243.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Equine Vet J Suppl


  4 in total

1.  The effect of horseshoes and surfaces on horse and jockey centre of mass displacements at gallop.

Authors:  Kate Horan; Kieran Kourdache; James Coburn; Peter Day; Henry Carnall; Dan Harborne; Liam Brinkley; Lucy Hammond; Sean Millard; Bryony Lancaster; Thilo Pfau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Hoof Impact and Foot-Off Accelerations in Galloping Thoroughbred Racehorses Trialling Eight Shoe-Surface Combinations.

Authors:  Kate Horan; James Coburn; Kieran Kourdache; Peter Day; Henry Carnall; Liam Brinkley; Dan Harborne; Lucy Hammond; Mick Peterson; Sean Millard; Thilo Pfau
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Trot Accelerations of Equine Front and Hind Hooves Shod with Polyurethane Composite Shoes and Steel Shoes on Asphalt.

Authors:  Lauren Veneta Moore; Rebeka Roza Zsoldos; Theresia Franziska Licka
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  The Effect of Horse Shoeing with Egg Bar Shoes and Shoes with Wedge Pads on the Results of Thermal Imaging of the Equine Distal Limb.

Authors:  Marta Mieszkowska; Zbigniew Adamiak; Piotr Holak; Joanna Głodek; Ewa Jastrzębska; Katarzyna Wolińska; Marcin Mieszkowski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.