Literature DB >> 21058547

The relationship between maternal phenotype and offspring quality: do older mothers really produce the best offspring?

Dustin J Marshall1, Selina S Heppell, Stephan B Munch, Robert R Warner.   

Abstract

Maternal effects are increasingly recognized as important drivers of population dynamics and determinants of evolutionary trajectories. Recently, there has been a proliferation of studies finding or citing a positive relationship between maternal size/age and offspring size or offspring quality. The relationship between maternal phenotype and offspring size is intriguing in that it is unclear why young mothers should produce offspring of inferior quality or fitness. Here we evaluate the underlying evolutionary pressures that may lead to a maternal size/age-offspring size correlation and consider the likelihood that such a correlation results in a positive relationship between the age or size of mothers and the fitness of their offspring. We find that, while there are a number of reasons why selection may favor the production of larger offspring by larger mothers, this change in size is more likely due to associated changes in the maternal phenotype that affect the offspring size-performance relationship. We did not find evidence that the offspring of older females should have intrinsically higher fitness. When we explored this issue theoretically, the only instance in which smaller mothers produce suboptimal offspring sizes is when a (largely unsupported) constraint on maximum offspring size is introduced into the model. It is clear that larger offspring fare better than smaller offspring when reared in the same environment, but this misses a critical point: different environments elicit selection for different optimal sizes of young. We suggest that caution should be exercised when interpreting the outcome of offspring-size experiments when offspring from different mothers are reared in a common environment, because this approach may remove the source of selection (e.g., reproducing in different context) that induced a shift in offspring size in the first place. It has been suggested that fish stocks should be managed to preserve these older age classes because larger mothers produce offspring with a greater chance of survival and subsequent recruitment. Overall, we suggest that, while there are clear and compelling reasons for preserving older females in exploited populations, there is little theoretical justification or evidence that older mothers produce offspring with higher per capita fitness than do younger mothers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21058547     DOI: 10.1890/09-0156.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  18 in total

1.  Larger female fish contribute disproportionately more to self-replenishment.

Authors:  R Beldade; S J Holbrook; R J Schmitt; S Planes; D Malone; G Bernardi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Thermal and maternal environments shape the value of early hatching in a natural population of a strongly cannibalistic freshwater fish.

Authors:  Thilo Pagel; Dorte Bekkevold; Stefan Pohlmeier; Christian Wolter; Robert Arlinghaus
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Body size-specific maternal effects on the offspring environment shape juvenile phenotypes in Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Njal Rollinson; Jeffrey A Hutchings
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Reproductive hyperallometry and managing the world's fisheries.

Authors:  Dustin J Marshall; Michael Bode; Marc Mangel; Robert Arlinghaus; E J Dick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Interactive effects of parental age on offspring fitness and age-assortative mating in a wild bird.

Authors:  Emerson Keith Bowers; Scott K Sakaluk; Charles F Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2017-06

6.  Maternal size and age shape offspring size in a live-bearing fish, Xiphophorus birchmanni.

Authors:  Holly K Kindsvater; Gil G Rosenthal; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How fast is fisheries-induced evolution? Quantitative analysis of modelling and empirical studies.

Authors:  Asta Audzijonyte; Anna Kuparinen; Elizabeth A Fulton
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Maternal effects on offspring size and number in mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki.

Authors:  Rose E O'Dea; Regina Vega-Trejo; Megan L Head; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Bigger mothers are better mothers: disentangling size-related prenatal and postnatal maternal effects.

Authors:  Sandra Steiger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Effects of ocean acidification on embryonic respiration and development of a temperate wrasse living along a natural CO2 gradient.

Authors:  Carlo Cattano; Folco Giomi; Marco Milazzo
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.