Literature DB >> 21058114

Understanding the FDA guidance on adaptive designs: historical, legal, and statistical perspectives.

Qing Liu1, George Y H Chi.   

Abstract

The recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry on adaptive designs is perhaps one of the important undertakings by CDER/CBER Office of Biostatistics. Undoubtedly, adaptive designs may affect almost all phases of clinical development and impact nearly all aspects of clinical trial planning, execution and statistical inference. Thus, it is a significant accomplishment for the Office of Biostatistics to develop this well-thought-out and all-encompassing guidance document. In this paper, we discuss some critical topical issues of adaptive designs with supporting methodological work from either existing literature, additional technical notes, or accompanying papers. In particular, we provide numerous sources of design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation bias that arise from statistical procedures. We illustrate, as a result, and caution that substantial research is necessary for many adaptive designs to meet required scientific standards prior to their applications in clinical trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21058114     DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2010.514462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  4 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials: Application to Healthcare Epidemiology Research.

Authors:  W Charles Huskins; Vance G Fowler; Scott Evans
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Adaptive design of confirmatory trials: Advances and challenges.

Authors:  Tze Leung Lai; Philip W Lavori; Ka Wai Tsang
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  On robustness of noninferiority clinical trial designs against bias, variability, and nonconstancy.

Authors:  Qing Liu; Yulan Li; Katherine Odem-Davis
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 4.  An Investigation of the Shortcomings of the CONSORT 2010 Statement for the Reporting of Group Sequential Randomised Controlled Trials: A Methodological Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abigail Stevely; Munyaradzi Dimairo; Susan Todd; Steven A Julious; Jonathan Nicholl; Daniel Hind; Cindy L Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.