| Literature DB >> 21057976 |
Nina Desai1, Jing Xu, Tamara Tsulaia, Julia Szeptycki-Lawson, Faten AbdelHafez, James Goldfarb, Tommaso Falcone.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Vitrification technology presents new opportunities for preservation of embryo derived stem cells without first establishing a viable ESC line. This study tests the feasibility of cryopreserving ICM cells using vitrification.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21057976 PMCID: PMC3059526 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-010-9500-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet ISSN: 1058-0468 Impact factor: 3.412
Fig. 1ICMs were isolated from mouse blastocysts. (A) Fresh ICM before vitrification. (B-E) Morphology of vitrified—warmed ICMs after plating on MEF feeder layer. (B) 3 hours after warming (C) 24 hours (D) 48 hours (E) 72 hours. (F) Dome-like ICM outgrowth staining positive for alkaline phosphatase. Trophectodermal and MEF cells adjacent to ICM were negative for AP
Fig. 2Expression and localization of stem cell specific markers in vitrified-warmed ICMs after 48 hours in culture. ICMs were tested for expression of SSEA-1, Sox-2 and Oct-4 using immunoflouresecent staining. Cells were imaged using confocal laser microscopy. (A) ICM stained with SSEA 1 (red signal) and DAPI (blue signal). Staining is detected primarily on ICM cell surface. (B) Enlarged image of ICM cells stained with SSEA-1. (C) Sox-2 staining (red), detected in both nucleus and cytoplasm. (D) Oct-4 staining (red), mostly in the nucleus. MEF and any residual trophectodermal cells were negative for stem cell markers. (E) Oct-4 expression on Day 16 of culture
Effect of carrier on ICM vitrification
| Recovery | Survival | Attachment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoloop(Open) | 21/21 (100%) | 21/21 (100%) | 20/21 (95%) |
| HSV (Closed) | 57/58 (98%) | 57/57 (100%) | 54/57 (95%) |
*No significant differences were found between carriers for all parameters (P > 0.05)