Literature DB >> 21057655

A simplified formula for quantification of the probability of deterministic assignments in permuted block randomization.

Wenle Zhao1, Yanqiu Weng.   

Abstract

Open label and single blinded randomized controlled clinical trials are vulnerable to selection bias when the next treatment assignment is predictable based on the randomization algorithm and the preceding assignment history. While treatment predictability is an issue for all constrained randomization algorithms, deterministic assignments are unique to permuted block randomization. Deterministic assignments may lead to treatment predictability with certainty and selection bias, which could inflate the type I error and hurts the validity of trial results. It is important to accurately evaluate the probability of deterministic assignments in permuted block randomization, so proper protection measures can be implemented. For trials with number of treatment arms T = 2 and a balance block size B = 2m, Matts and Lachin indicated that the probability of deterministic assignment is 1m+1. For more general situations, with T ≥ 2 and a block size B=∑j=1Tmj, Dupin-Spriet provided a formula, which can be written as 1B∑j=1T∑i=1mj∏k=1imj-k+1B-k+1. This formula involves extensive calculation in evaluation. In this paper, we simplified this formula to 1B∑j=1TmjB-mj+1 for general scenarios and 1B-m+1 for trials with a balanced allocation. Through mathematical induction we show the equivalence of the formulas. While the new formula is numerically equivalent to Dupin-Spriet's formula, the simple format not only is easier for evaluation, but also is clearer in describing the impact of parameters T and m(i) on the probability of deterministic assignments.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21057655      PMCID: PMC2968741          DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference        ISSN: 0378-3758            Impact factor:   1.111


  9 in total

1.  Detecting selection bias in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  V W Berger; D V Exner
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-08

2.  International conference on harmonisation; guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials; availability--FDA. Notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1998-09-16

3.  Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.

Authors:  Thérèse Dupin-Spriet; Jacques Fermanian; Alain Spriet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Efficient generation of constrained block allocation sequences.

Authors:  Ibrahim Salama; Anastasia Ivanova; Bahjat Qaqish
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.

Authors:  Vance W Berger; Anastasia Ivanova; Maria Deloria Knoll
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  A review of methods for ensuring the comparability of comparison groups in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2006-01

7.  Randomization, permuted blocks, masking, allocation concealment, and selection bias in the Tobacco Quit Line Study.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Quantifying the magnitude of baseline covariate imbalances resulting from selection bias in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.207

9.  Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials.

Authors:  J P Matts; J M Lachin
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1988-12
  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  A better alternative to stratified permuted block design for subject randomization in clinical trials.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Mass weighted urn design--A new randomization algorithm for unequal allocations.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 3.  Block urn design - a new randomization algorithm for sequential trials with two or more treatments and balanced or unbalanced allocation.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao; Yanqiu Weng
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Characterizing permuted block randomization as a big stick procedure.

Authors:  Vance W Berger; Isoken Odia
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-01-29

Review 5.  Sphingolipidomics in Translational Sepsis Research-Biomedical Considerations and Perspectives.

Authors:  Ralf A Claus; Markus H Graeler
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.