OBJECTIVES: We herein assessed the influence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene mutations on EGFR expression levels, downstream mediators such as Akt or ERK, and overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer. STUDY DESIGN: EGFR mutation status was analyzed by direct sequencing in 102 Japanese ovarian cancer patients. The EGFR expression, phosphorylated Akt (pAkt), and phosphorylated ERK (pERK) were determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Twenty-nine EGFR gene mutations were detected in 24 of 102 patinets (23.5%). EGFR mutations were observed in 27.9% (19/68) in serous adenocarcinomas, 15.0% (3/20) in clear cell adenocarcinomas, and 66.7% (2/3) in mucinous adenocarcinomas, while no mutations were observed in endometrioid adenocarcinomas (0/11). Protein expression of EGFR, pAkt, and pERK were detected in 47 (46.1%), 49 (48%), and 17 (16.7%) of patients, respectively. EGFR gene mutations, EGFR and pERK expression were not associated with a poor prognosis. In a multivariate analysis, a High pAkt expression was found to be a significant predictor for both the progression free survival (p=0.017) and overall survival (P=0.025). CONCLUSION: EGFR gene mutations were frequently observed in not only non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but also in ovarian cancer in Japanese patients. the selective EGFR inhibitor Gefitinib might therefore offer some benefit in patients with EGFR mutations in ovarian cancer. Our results indicate that the Akt, but not necessarily EGFR, is one of the most important target in the response of the platinum-based chemotherapy and prognosis for ovarian cancer patients.
OBJECTIVES: We herein assessed the influence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene mutations on EGFR expression levels, downstream mediators such as Akt or ERK, and overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer. STUDY DESIGN:EGFR mutation status was analyzed by direct sequencing in 102 Japanese ovarian cancerpatients. The EGFR expression, phosphorylated Akt (pAkt), and phosphorylated ERK (pERK) were determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Twenty-nine EGFR gene mutations were detected in 24 of 102 patinets (23.5%). EGFR mutations were observed in 27.9% (19/68) in serous adenocarcinomas, 15.0% (3/20) in clear cell adenocarcinomas, and 66.7% (2/3) in mucinous adenocarcinomas, while no mutations were observed in endometrioid adenocarcinomas (0/11). Protein expression of EGFR, pAkt, and pERK were detected in 47 (46.1%), 49 (48%), and 17 (16.7%) of patients, respectively. EGFR gene mutations, EGFR and pERK expression were not associated with a poor prognosis. In a multivariate analysis, a High pAkt expression was found to be a significant predictor for both the progression free survival (p=0.017) and overall survival (P=0.025). CONCLUSION:EGFR gene mutations were frequently observed in not only non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but also in ovarian cancer in Japanese patients. the selective EGFR inhibitor Gefitinib might therefore offer some benefit in patients with EGFR mutations in ovarian cancer. Our results indicate that the Akt, but not necessarily EGFR, is one of the most important target in the response of the platinum-based chemotherapy and prognosis for ovarian cancerpatients.
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Science Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lin Yang; Han C Dan; Mei Sun; Qiyuan Liu; Xia-meng Sun; Richard I Feldman; Andrew D Hamilton; Mark Polokoff; Santo V Nicosia; Meenhard Herlyn; Said M Sebti; Jin Q Cheng Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C Elie; J F Geay; M Morcos; A Le Tourneau; V Girre; P Broët; B Marmey; L Chauvenet; J Audouin; E Pujade-Lauraine; S Camilleri-Broët Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-08-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Hilary A White; Yi Jin; Louis G Chicoine; Bernadette Chen; Yusen Liu; Leif D Nelin Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Kaitlin C Fogg; Will R Olson; Jamison N Miller; Aisha Khan; Carine Renner; Isaac Hale; Paul S Weisman; Pamela K Kreeger Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 8.679