Literature DB >> 21057094

Explaining health care system change: problem pressure and the emergence of "hybrid" health care systems.

Achim Schmid1, Mirella Cacace, Ralf Götze, Heinz Rothgang.   

Abstract

In this article, we will further the explanation of the state's changing role in health care systems belonging to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). We build on our analysis of twenty-three OECD countries, which reveals broad trends regarding governments' role in financing, service provision, and regulation. In particular, we identified increasing similarities between the three system types we delineate as National Health Service (NHS), social health insurance, and private health insurance systems. We argue that the specific health care system type is an essential contributor to these changes. We highlight that health care systems tend to feature specific, type-related deficiencies, which cannot be solved by routine mechanisms. As a consequence, non-system-specific elements and innovative policies are implemented, which leads to the emergence of "hybrid" systems and indicates a trend toward convergence, or increasing similarities. We elaborate this hypothesis in two steps. First, we describe system-specific deficits of each health care system type and provide an overview of major adaptive responses to these deficits. The adaptive responses can be considered as non-system-specific interventions that broaden the portfolio of regulatory policies. Second, we examine diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) as a common approach for financing hospitals efficiently, which are nevertheless shaped by type-specific deficiencies and reform requirements. In the United States' private insurance system, DRGs are mainly used as a means of hierarchical cost control, while their implementation in the English NHS system is to increase productivity of hospital services. In the German social health insurance system, DRGs support competition as a means to control self-regulated providers. Thus, DRGs contribute to the hybridization of health care systems because they tend to strengthen coordination mechanisms that were less developed in the existing health care systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21057094     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-2010-013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  6 in total

1.  Does healthcare financing converge? Evidence from eight OECD countries.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Chen
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2013-09-15

2.  Combined social and private health insurance versus catastrophic out of pocket payments for private hospital care in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos Grigorakis; Christos Floros; Haritini Tsangari; Evangelos Tsoukatos
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2017-01-03

3.  Do caesarean section rates 'catch-up'? Evidence from 14 European countries.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Chen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2013-03-22

Review 4.  Preventing Youth from Falling Through the Cracks Between Child/Adolescent and Adult Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review of Models of Care.

Authors:  Tram Nguyen; Mark G Embrett; Neil G Barr; Gillian M Mulvale; Diana K Vania; Glen E Randall; Briano DiRezze
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-02-20

5.  Healthcare Systems in Comparative Perspective: Classification, Convergence, Institutions, Inequalities, and Five Missed Turns.

Authors:  Jason Beckfield; Sigrun Olafsdottir; Benjamin Sosnaud
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2013-05-17

Review 6.  The evolution of Taiwan's National Health Insurance drug reimbursement scheme.

Authors:  Jason C Hsu; Christine Y Lu
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.117

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.