Literature DB >> 21056808

Retrospective analysis of anesthetic interventions for obese patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.

Alexander Butwick1, Brendan Carvalho, Christina Danial, Edward Riley.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI), perioperative times, and anesthetic interventions in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. MEASUREMENTS: All patients were ranked according to BMI (kg/m(2)) at the time of delivery. The BMI groups were designated a priori: ≤ 29.9 kg/m(2) (Group C); 30-34.9 kg/m(2) (Group I); 35-39.9 kg/m(2) (Group II), and ≥ 40 kg/m(2) (Group III). One hundred patients (25 pts per group) underwent elective cesarean delivery. Data collected included anesthetic technique, perioperative times, anesthesia-related costs, and neonatal outcomes. MAIN
RESULTS: A higher percentage of Group III patients (60%) received combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia than did Group C or Group I (18% and 16%, respectively; P < 0.05). The total intraoperative period was significantly longer in Group III (101 min) compared with Groups C, I, and II (81 min, 90 min, and 92 min, respectively; P < 0.05). Total intraoperative time increased significantly with BMI (R = 0.394 kg/m(2); P < 0.001). The highest anesthesia-related costs during the study were generated by patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2).
CONCLUSION: Our single-center experience showed that choice of anesthetic technique (CSE vs. spinal anesthesia) varies according to obesity class. Longer intraoperative periods must be considered in deciding upon the mode of anesthesia for patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2) who undergo elective cesarean delivery.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21056808     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  5 in total

1.  A study of factors influencing surgical cesarean delivery times in an academic tertiary center.

Authors:  A Gonzalez Fiol; M-L Meng; V Danhakl; M Kim; R Miller; R Smiley
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.603

2.  Associations between maternal size and health outcomes for women undergoing caesarean section: a multicentre prospective observational study (The MUM SIZE Study).

Authors:  Alicia Therese Dennis; Karen Elaine Lamb; David Story; Michelle Tew; Kim Dalziel; Philip Clarke; Jospeh Lew; Anna Parker; Elizabeth Hessian; Gyln Teale; Scott Simmons; Dan Casalaz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Effect of Intravenous Ketamine on Hypocranial Pressure Symptoms in Patients with Spinal Anesthetic Cesarean Sections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoshen Liang; Xin Yang; Shuang Liang; Yu Zhang; Zhuofeng Ding; Qulian Guo; Changsheng Huang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Epidural catheter placement in morbidly obese parturients with the use of an epidural depth equation prior to ultrasound visualization.

Authors:  Sukhdip Singh; Keith M Wirth; Amy L Phelps; Manasi H Badve; Tanmay H Shah; Neera Sah; Manuel C Vallejo
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-07-25

Review 5.  Managing anesthesia for cesarean section in obese patients: current perspectives.

Authors:  Agnes M Lamon; Ashraf S Habib
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2016-08-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.