BACKGROUND: The aetiology of bladder pain syndrome (BPS) remains poorly understood, and a number of pathogenic mechanisms have been proposed. The importance of genetic factors for BPS is receiving growing attention, but data so far are of a preliminary nature. OBJECTIVE: To empirically assess the genetic and environmental contribution to BPS in a population-based sample of twins. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included >25,000 twins born between 1959 and 1985. Individuals with BPS were identified using latent class cluster analysis (LCCA) based on self-reported symptoms from a nationwide screening for complex diseases in the Swedish Twin Registry. By comparing monozygotic and dizygotic twins, we estimated twin similarity and the relative proportions of phenotypic variance resulting from genetic and environmental factors. MEASUREMENTS: Twin similarity was measured. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The LCCA yielded an overall BPS prevalence of 1.1% and 2.4% for males and females, respectively. In males, the contribution of genetic effects to BPS could not be assessed because of the small number of concordant twin pairs. In women, twin similarity estimates indicated a genetic component for the aetiology of BPS, but genetic factors contributed less than one-third of the total variation in susceptibility to BPS. Nonshared environmental factors accounted for more than two-thirds of the variance, whereas early nongenetic factors shared within the family were of little or no consequence to the risk of developing BPS later in life. Use of self-reported symptoms to define the disease phenotype is a limitation of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of environmental factors in the development of BPS in women is substantial, whereas genetic influences are of only modest importance for the possibility of developing the disease. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: The aetiology of bladder pain syndrome (BPS) remains poorly understood, and a number of pathogenic mechanisms have been proposed. The importance of genetic factors for BPS is receiving growing attention, but data so far are of a preliminary nature. OBJECTIVE: To empirically assess the genetic and environmental contribution to BPS in a population-based sample of twins. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included >25,000 twins born between 1959 and 1985. Individuals with BPS were identified using latent class cluster analysis (LCCA) based on self-reported symptoms from a nationwide screening for complex diseases in the Swedish Twin Registry. By comparing monozygotic and dizygotic twins, we estimated twin similarity and the relative proportions of phenotypic variance resulting from genetic and environmental factors. MEASUREMENTS: Twin similarity was measured. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The LCCA yielded an overall BPS prevalence of 1.1% and 2.4% for males and females, respectively. In males, the contribution of genetic effects to BPS could not be assessed because of the small number of concordant twin pairs. In women, twin similarity estimates indicated a genetic component for the aetiology of BPS, but genetic factors contributed less than one-third of the total variation in susceptibility to BPS. Nonshared environmental factors accounted for more than two-thirds of the variance, whereas early nongenetic factors shared within the family were of little or no consequence to the risk of developing BPS later in life. Use of self-reported symptoms to define the disease phenotype is a limitation of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of environmental factors in the development of BPS in women is substantial, whereas genetic influences are of only modest importance for the possibility of developing the disease. Copyright Â
Authors: R Peeker; F Aldenborg; A Dahlström; L Enerbäck; K Haglid; S L Johansson; J Ya-Li; L Rosengren; M Fall Journal: Urology Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Charles F Turner; Susan M Rogers; Heather G Miller; William C Miller; James N Gribble; James R Chromy; Peter A Leone; Phillip C Cooley; Thomas C Quinn; Jonathan M Zenilman Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joop P van de Merwe; Jørgen Nordling; Pierre Bouchelouche; Kirsten Bouchelouche; Mauro Cervigni; L Kurosch Daha; Suzy Elneil; Magnus Fall; Gero Hohlbrugger; Paul Irwin; Svend Mortensen; Arndt van Ophoven; John L Osborne; Ralph Peeker; Benedikte Richter; Claus Riedl; Jukka Sairanen; Martina Tinzl; Jean-Jacques Wyndaele Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Gisela G Chelimsky; Sheng Yang; Tatiana Sanses; Curtis Tatsuoka; C A Tony Buffington; Jeffrey Janata; Patrick McCabe; Mary-Alice Dombroski; Sarah Ialacci; Adonis Hijaz; Sangeeta Mahajan; Denniz Zolnoun; Thomas C Chelimsky Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Andrew Schrepf; Catherine S Bradley; Michael O'Donnell; Yi Luo; Steven E Harte; Karl Kreder; Susan Lutgendorf Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Niloofar Afari; Marianna Gasperi; Christopher W Forsberg; Jack Goldberg; Dedra Buchwald; John N Krieger Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 7.450