Literature DB >> 21056471

Health impact assessment of a reduction in ambient PM(2.5) levels in Spain.

Elena Boldo1, Cristina Linares, Julio Lumbreras, Rafael Borge, Adolfo Narros, Javier García-Pérez, Pablo Fernández-Navarro, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Nuria Aragonés, Rebeca Ramis, Marina Pollán, Teresa Moreno, Angeliki Karanasiou, Gonzalo López-Abente.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health effects linked to exposure to high air pollutant levels have been described in depth, and many recent epidemiologic studies have also consistently reported positive associations between exposure to air pollutants at low concentrations (particularly PM(2.5)) and adverse health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the number of avoidable deaths associated with reducing PM(2.5) levels in Spain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For exposure assessment, we used the US Environmental Protection Agency's Community Multiscale Air Quality model to simulate air pollution levels with a spatial resolution of 18×18 km(2). Two different scenarios were compared, namely, a baseline 2004 scenario based on Spain's National Emissions Inventory and a projected 2011 scenario in which a reduction in PM(2.5) was estimated on the basis of the benefits that might be attained if specific air quality policies were implemented. Using an 18×18 km(2) grid, air pollution data were estimated for the entire Iberian Peninsula, the Balearic Islands, Ceuta and Melilla. For these strata, crude all-cause mortality rates (ICD-10: A00-Y98) were then calculated for the over-30 and 25-74 age groups, taking into account the 2004 population figures corresponding to these same age groups, selected in accordance with the concentration-response functions (Pope CA 3rd, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K et al. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA 2002; 287:1132-41; Laden F, Schwartz J, Speizer FE, Dockery DW. Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173:667-72.). Health impacts were assessed using the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP).
RESULTS: Air quality improvement was defined as an average annual reduction of 0.7 μg/m(3) in PM(2.5) levels. Using long-term health impact assessment analysis, we estimated that 1720 (673-2760) all-cause deaths (6 per 100,000 population) in the over-30 age group and 1450 (780-2108) all-cause deaths (5 per 100,000 population) in the 25-74 age group could be prevented annually.
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed the potential benefits in general mortality which could be expected if pollution control policies were successfully implemented by 2011. A specifically adapted BenMAP could be used as a tool for estimating health impacts associated with changes in air pollution in Spain.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21056471     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  23 in total

Review 1.  Air particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: the epidemiological, biomedical and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Yixing Du; Xiaohan Xu; Ming Chu; Yan Guo; Junhong Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The relationship between air pollutants and healthcare expenditure: empirical evidence from South Korea.

Authors:  Jiyeon An; Almas Heshmati
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Chemical characterization and quantitativ e assessment of source-specific health risk of trace metals in PM1.0 at a road site of Delhi, India.

Authors:  Jai Prakash; Tarachand Lohia; Anil K Mandariya; Gazala Habib; Tarun Gupta; Sanjay K Gupta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Cardiopulmonary Impact of Particulate Air Pollution in High-Risk Populations: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Jonathan D Newman; Deepak L Bhatt; Sanjay Rajagopalan; John R Balmes; Michael Brauer; Patrick N Breysse; Alison G M Brown; Mercedes R Carnethon; Wayne E Cascio; Gwen W Collman; Lawrence J Fine; Nadia N Hansel; Adrian Hernandez; Judith S Hochman; Michael Jerrett; Bonnie R Joubert; Joel D Kaufman; Ali O Malik; George A Mensah; David E Newby; Jennifer L Peel; Jeffrey Siegel; David Siscovick; Betsy L Thompson; Junfeng Zhang; Robert D Brook
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Health benefits from large-scale ozone reduction in the United States.

Authors:  Jesse D Berman; Neal Fann; John W Hollingsworth; Kent E Pinkerton; William N Rom; Anthony M Szema; Patrick N Breysse; Ronald H White; Frank C Curriero
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Oxidative stress and air pollution exposure.

Authors:  Maura Lodovici; Elisabetta Bigagli
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2011-08-13

7.  Using Machine Learning to Estimate Global PM2.5 for Environmental Health Studies.

Authors:  D J Lary; T Lary; B Sattler
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2015-05-12

8.  Health impact assessment of air pollution in Valladolid, Spain.

Authors:  Mario Cárdaba Arranz; María Fe Muñoz Moreno; Alicia Armentia Medina; Margarita Alonso Capitán; Fernando Carreras Vaquer; Ana Almaraz Gómez
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Environmental inequality in exposures to airborne particulate matter components in the United States.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Keita Ebisu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Population dynamics and air pollution: the impact of demographics on health impact assessment of air pollution.

Authors:  Esben Meulengracht Flachs; Jan Sørensen; Jakob Bønløkke; Henrik Brønnum-Hansen
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2013-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.