Literature DB >> 21056275

Rendering stone fragments paramagnetic with iron-oxide microparticles improves the efficiency and effectiveness of endoscopic stone fragment retrieval.

Chad R Tracy1, Stacey L McLeroy, Sara L Best, Bruce E Gnade, Margaret S Pearle, Jeffrey A Cadeddu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop peptide-coated iron oxide-based microparticles that selectively adhere to calcium stone fragments, thereby enabling magnetic manipulation of human stone fragments.
METHODS: In phase 1, human stone fragments were coated overnight with iron oxide-based microparticles. Groups of 10 coated stones (1.5-3 mm) were placed into a bladder simulator and removed cystoscopically with either an 8 Fr magnetic extraction device or a 2.4 Fr nitinol basket. In phase 2, the peptide coating was optimized and 2 stone fragment sizes (1-2 mm and 2-3 mm) were exposed to 3 separate concentrations of microparticles for 3 different incubation times. In each trial, 10 fragments were placed into a glass vial and removed using the 8 Fr magnetic device.
RESULTS: In phase 1, mean total time for removal of all fragments was 53% shorter using the magnetic instrument compared with basket extraction. An average of 3.7 extractions was required to magnetically remove all fragments versus 9.4 for basket extraction. In phase 2, 18 different combinations of particle concentrations, fragment sizes, and incubation times were tested; 91% of small fragment trials and 43% of large fragment trials yielded successful fragment extraction. Of the small fragments, 100% were successfully extracted at both the middle and high particle concentrations after 2 minutes, and of the large fragments 70% and 100% were successfully extracted after 10 minutes of incubation at the lowest and highest concentrations, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Rendering stone fragments paramagnetic with novel microparticles allows manipulation and removal using a novel magnetic device in vitro, potentially improving surgical efficacy and efficiency.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21056275     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

Review 1.  Ureteroscopy from the recent past to the near future.

Authors:  José Manuel Reis Santos
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Physical therapy in the management of stone fragments: progress, status, and needs.

Authors:  Suoshi Jing; Qiongyan Gai; Xin Zhao; Juan Wang; Yuwen Gong; Yangyang Pang; Chen Peng; Yuejun Tian; Yuhan Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Evaluation of dusting versus basketing - can new technologies improve stone-free rates?

Authors:  Brian Weiss; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  How to accelerate the upper urinary stone discharge after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for < 15 mm upper urinary stones: a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial about external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL).

Authors:  Wenqi Wu; Zhou Yang; Fengling Tang; Changbao Xu; Youzhi Wang; Xiaojian Gu; Xuehua Chen; Rongjiang Wang; Jiaka Yan; Xiang Wang; Wenxi Gao; Chunhua Hou; Jianming Guo; Jian Zhang; Alberto Gurioli; Zhangqun Ye; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.