Literature DB >> 21055714

Impact of clinical presentation and pretest likelihood on the relation between calcium score and computed tomographic coronary angiography.

Jacob M van Werkhoven1, Stephanie M de Boer, Joanne D Schuijf, Filippo Cademartiri, Erica Maffei, J Wouter Jukema, Mark J Boogers, Lucia J Kroft, Albert de Roos, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess the impact of clinical presentation and pretest likelihood on the relation between coronary calcium score (CCS) and computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) to determine the role of CCS as a gatekeeper to CTA in patients presenting with chest pain. In 576 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), CCS and CTA were performed. CCS was categorized as 0, 1 to 400, and >400. On CT angiogram the presence of significant CAD (≥50% luminal narrowing) was determined. Significant CAD was observed in 14 of 242 patients (5.8%) with CCS 0, in 94 of 260 patients (36.2%) with CCS 1 to 400, and in 60 of 74 patients (81.1%) with CCS >400. In patients with CCS 0, prevalence of significant CAD increased from 3.9% to 4.1% and 14.3% in nonanginal, atypical, and typical chest pain, respectively, and from 3.4% to 3.9% and 27.3% with a low, intermediate, and high pretest likelihood, respectively. In patients with CCS 1 to 400, prevalence of significant CAD increased from 27.4% to 34.7% and 51.7% in nonanginal, atypical, and typical chest pain, respectively, and from 15.4% to 35.6% and 50% in low, intermediate, and high pretest likelihood, respectively. In patients with CCS >400, prevalence of significant CAD on CT angiogram remained high (>72%) regardless of clinical presentation and pretest likelihood. In conclusion, the relation between CCS and CTA is influenced by clinical presentation and pretest likelihood. These factors should be taken into account when using CCS as a gatekeeper for CTA.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21055714     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  18 in total

Review 1.  Coronary artery calcium scoring and its impact on the clinical practice in the era of multidetector CT.

Authors:  Jongmin Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Coronary artery calcium score as a gatekeeper in the non-invasive evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Elsemiek M Engbers; Jorik R Timmer; Jan Paul Ottervanger
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Prevalence and predictors of coronary artery disease in patients with a calcium score of zero.

Authors:  Maria Salomé Leal de Carvalho; Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Pedro Jerónimo de Sousa; Helder Dores; António Ferreira; Nuno Cardim; Miguel Mota Carmo; Ana Aleixo; Miguel Mendes; Francisco Pereira Machado; José Roquette; Hugo Marques
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification in patients with stable chest symptoms.

Authors:  D Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen; D Kuijpers; P R M van Dijkman
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Prognostic Relationship Between Coronary Artery Calcium Score, Perfusion Defects, and Myocardial Blood Flow Reserve in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Krishna K Patel; Poghni A Peri-Okonny; Raed Qarajeh; Femina S Patel; Brett W Sperry; A Iain McGhie; Randall C Thompson; Kevin F Kennedy; Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Timothy M Bateman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 7.  The Synergistic Use of Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging and Noninvasive Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detecting Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Myocardial Ischemia.

Authors:  Alan Rozanski; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  What is the role of calcium scoring in the age of coronary computed tomographic angiography?

Authors:  Parag H Joshi; Michael J Blaha; Roger S Blumenthal; Ron Blankstein; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography for stenosis detection according to calcium score: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martijn A M den Dekker; Kristof de Smet; Geertruida H de Bock; Rene A Tio; Matthijs Oudkerk; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Zero coronary calcium in the presence of three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease in a Hodgkin lymphoma survivor.

Authors:  E M Engbers; M Mouden; P L Jager; J R Timmer
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.