Literature DB >> 21055523

[Update of the GEFPICS' recommendations for HER2 status determination in breast cancers in France].

Frédérique Penault-Llorca1, Anne Vincent-Salomon, Jean-Pierre Bellocq, Marie-Christine Matthieu, Gaetan-Mac Grogan, Isabelle Treilleux, Francette Ettore, Sophie Laberge-Le Couteulx, Brigitte Sigal, Jerome Couturier, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Martine Antoine, André Balaton, Marie-Christine Baranzelli, Valérie Becette, Cécile Blanc-Fournier, Frédéric Bibeau, Eva Brabencova, Sabrina Croce, Viviana Fridman, Pascal Génin, Jean-Pierre Ghnassia, Jocelyne Jacquemier, Bruno Poulet, Pascal Roger, Christine Sagan, Patrick Tas, Martine Trassard, Véronique Verriele, Laurent Arnould.   

Abstract

In Europe, patients who may benefit from an HER2 targeted drug are currently selected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In situ hybridization (ISH) techniques should be used for complementary assessment of ambiguous 2+ IHC cases and for the calibration of the IHC technique. Eligibility to an HER2 target treatment is defined by an HER2 positive status being IHC test 3+ or 2+ amplified. Reliable detection of HER2 status is essential to the appropriate usage of HER2 targeted drugs because its specificity is limited to tumors overexpressing HER2. It is essential that the IHC evaluation of the HER2 status of a mammary carcinoma is optimized and reliable. This GEFPICS' guidelines look over the different steps of the IHC technique, the controls and, the rules for interpretation. Once acquired, this knowledge must be perpetuated by the observation of rules of good technical practice (internal and external controls, quality assurance programs).
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21055523     DOI: 10.1016/j.annpat.2010.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pathol        ISSN: 0242-6498            Impact factor:   0.407


  9 in total

1.  Discordances in estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and HER2 status between primary breast cancer and metastasis.

Authors:  Elsa Curtit; Virginie Nerich; Laura Mansi; Loic Chaigneau; Laurent Cals; Cristian Villanueva; Fernando Bazan; Philippe Montcuquet; Nathalie Meneveau; Sophie Perrin; Marie-Paule Algros; Xavier Pivot
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-30

2.  Respective prognostic value of genomic grade and histological proliferation markers in early stage (pN0) breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Fabien Reyal; Marc A Bollet; Martial Caly; David Gentien; Sabrina Carpentier; Hélène Peyro-Saint-Paul; Jean-Yves Pierga; Paul Cottu; Véronique Dieras; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Xavier Sastre-Garau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Histological grade concordance between diagnostic core biopsy and corresponding surgical specimen in HR-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma.

Authors:  C Daveau; S Baulies; M Lalloum; M Bollet; B Sigal-Zafrani; X Sastre; A Vincent-Salomon; A Tardivon; F Thibault; J Y Pierga; P Cottu; M P Sablin; R Rouzier; C Malhaire; P Mallon; F Reyal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Prognostic impact of discrepant Ki67 and mitotic index on hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast carcinoma.

Authors:  L Rossi; E Laas; P Mallon; A Vincent-Salomon; J-M Guinebretiere; F Lerebours; R Rouzier; J-Y Pierga; F Reyal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Long-term prognostic performance of Ki67 rate in early stage, pT1-pT2, pN0, invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Fabien Reyal; David Hajage; Alexia Savignoni; Jean-Guillaume Feron; Marc Andrew Bollet; Youlia Kirova; Alain Fourquet; Jean-Yves Pierga; Paul Cottu; Veronique Dieras; Virginie Fourchotte; Fatima Laki; Severine Alran; Bernard Asselain; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Xavier Sastre-Garau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimization of routine KRAS mutation PCR-based testing procedure for rational individualized first-line-targeted therapy selection in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Chretien; Alexandre Harlé; Magali Meyer-Lefebvre; Marie Rouyer; Marie Husson; Carole Ramacci; Valentin Harter; Pascal Genin; Agnès Leroux; Jean-Louis Merlin
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  SISH/CISH or qPCR as alternative techniques to FISH for determination of HER2 amplification status on breast tumors core needle biopsies: a multicenter experience based on 840 cases.

Authors:  Jocelyne Jacquemier; Frédérique Spyratos; Benjamin Esterni; Marie-Joëlle Mozziconacci; Martine Antoine; Laurent Arnould; Sarab Lizard; Philippe Bertheau; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; Cécile Blanc Fournier; Sophie Krieger; Frédéric Bibeau; Pierre-Jean Lamy; Marie Pierre Chenard; Michèle Legrain; Jean-Marc Guinebretière; Delphine Loussouarn; Gaëtan Macgrogan; Isabelle Hostein; Marie Christine Mathieu; Ludovic Lacroix; Alexander Valent; Yves Marie Robin; Françoise Revillion; Magali Lacroix Triki; Aline Seaume; Anne Vincent Salomon; Patricia de Cremoux; Geneviève Portefaix; Luc Xerri; Sophie Vacher; Ivan Bièche; Frédérique Penault-Llorca
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 screening tests for breast cancer suggested by the new updated recommendation of the american society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists will involve a rise of the in-situ hybridization tests for the European laboratories of pathology.

Authors:  Christian Garbar; Aude-Marie Savoye; Corinne Mascaux; Eva Brabencova; Hervé Curé
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2014-04-22

9.  Estrogen-Receptor, Progesterone-Receptor and HER2 Status Determination in Invasive Breast Cancer. Concordance between Immuno-Histochemistry and MapQuant™ Microarray Based Assay.

Authors:  D Mouttet; M Laé; M Caly; D Gentien; S Carpentier; H Peyro-Saint-Paul; A Vincent-Salomon; R Rouzier; B Sigal-Zafrani; X Sastre-Garau; F Reyal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.