Literature DB >> 21054934

Differences in cartilage-forming capacity of expanded human chondrocytes from ear and nose and their gene expression profiles.

Catharine A Hellingman1, Eugène T P Verwiel, Inez Slagt, Wendy Koevoet, René M L Poublon, Gilbert J Nolst-Trenité, Robert J Baatenburg de Jong, Holger Jahr, Gerjo J V M van Osch.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of culture-expanded human auricular and nasoseptal chondrocytes as cell source for regeneration of stable cartilage and to analyze the differences in gene expression profile of expanded chondrocytes from these specific locations. Auricular chondrocytes in monolayer proliferated less and more slowly (two passages took 26.7 ± 2.1 days and were reached in 4.37 ± 0.30 population doublings) than nasoseptal chondrocytes (19.3 ± 2.5 days; 5.45 ± 0.20 population doublings). However, auricular chondrocytes produced larger pellets with more cartilage-like matrix than nasoseptal chondrocytes (2.2 ± 0.71 vs. 1.7 ± 0.13 mm in diameter after 35 days of culture). Although the matrix formed by auricular and nasoseptal chondrocytes contained collagen X, it did not mineralize in an in vitro model or after in vivo subcutaneous implantation. A DNA microarray study on expanded auricular and nasoseptal chondrocytes from the same donors revealed 1,090 differentially expressed genes. No difference was observed in the expression of known markers of chondrogenic capacity (e.g., collagen II, FGFR3, BMP2, and ALK1). The most striking differences were that the auricular chondrocytes had a higher expression of anabolic growth factors BMP5 and IGF1, while matrix-degrading enzymes MMP13 and ADAMTS5 were higher expressed in nasoseptal chondrocytes. This might offer a possible explanation for the observed higher matrix production by auricular chondrocytes. Moreover, chondrocytes isolated from auricular or nasoseptal cartilage had specific gene expression profiles even after expansion. These differently expressed genes were not restricted to known characterization of donor site subtype (e.g., elastic), but were also related to developmental processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21054934     DOI: 10.3727/096368910X539119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Transplant        ISSN: 0963-6897            Impact factor:   4.064


  14 in total

1.  Development of scaffold-free elastic cartilaginous constructs with structural similarities to auricular cartilage.

Authors:  Renata Giardini-Rosa; Paulo P Joazeiro; Kathryn Thomas; Kristina Collavino; Joanna Weber; Stephen D Waldman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  A photo-crosslinkable cartilage-derived extracellular matrix bioink for auricular cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Dafydd O Visscher; Hyeongjin Lee; Paul P M van Zuijlen; Marco N Helder; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Poly(γ-Glutamic Acid) as an Exogenous Promoter of Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells.

Authors:  Joana C Antunes; Roman Tsaryk; Raquel M Gonçalves; Catarina Leite Pereira; Constantin Landes; Christoph Brochhausen; Shahram Ghanaati; Mário A Barbosa; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Rhinosurgery in children: developmental and surgical aspects of the growing nose.

Authors:  Carel D A Verwoerd; Henriette L Verwoerd-Verhoef
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27

5.  Growth factor stimulation improves the structure and properties of scaffold-free engineered auricular cartilage constructs.

Authors:  Renata G Rosa; Paulo P Joazeiro; Juares Bianco; Manuela Kunz; Joanna F Weber; Stephen D Waldman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Extensively Expanded Auricular Chondrocytes Form Neocartilage In Vivo.

Authors:  Alan Tseng; Irina Pomerantseva; Michael J Cronce; Anya M Kimura; Craig M Neville; Mark A Randolph; Joseph P Vacanti; Cathryn A Sundback
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Structural and Mechanical Comparison of Human Ear, Alar, and Septal Cartilage.

Authors:  Ernst Jan Bos; Mieke Pluemeekers; Marco Helder; Nikolay Kuzmin; Koen van der Laan; Marie-Louise Groot; Gerjo van Osch; Paul van Zuijlen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-01-18

8.  Multiethnic GWAS Reveals Polygenic Architecture of Earlobe Attachment.

Authors:  John R Shaffer; Jinxi Li; Myoung Keun Lee; Jasmien Roosenboom; Ekaterina Orlova; Kaustabh Adhikari; Carla Gallo; Giovanni Poletti; Lavinia Schuler-Faccini; Maria-Cátira Bortolini; Samuel Canizales-Quinteros; Francisco Rothhammer; Gabriel Bedoya; Rolando González-José; Paige E Pfeffer; Christopher A Wollenschlaeger; Jacqueline T Hecht; George L Wehby; Lina M Moreno; Anan Ding; Li Jin; Yajun Yang; Jenna C Carlson; Elizabeth J Leslie; Eleanor Feingold; Mary L Marazita; David A Hinds; Timothy C Cox; Sijia Wang; Andrés Ruiz-Linares; Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Biomarker Signatures of Quality for Engineering Nasal Chondrocyte-Derived Cartilage.

Authors:  M Adelaide Asnaghi; Laura Power; Andrea Barbero; Martin Haug; Ruth Köppl; David Wendt; Ivan Martin
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-07

10.  Trophic effects of adipose-tissue-derived and bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells enhance cartilage generation by chondrocytes in co-culture.

Authors:  M M Pleumeekers; L Nimeskern; J L M Koevoet; M Karperien; K S Stok; G J V M van Osch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.