Literature DB >> 21054846

No significantly increased frequency of the inversion polymorphism at the WBS-critical region 7q11.23 in German parents of patients with Williams-Beuren syndrome as compared to a population control.

Judith Frohnauer1, Almuth Caliebe, Stefan Gesk, Carl-Joachim Partsch, Reiner Siebert, Rainer Pankau, Jutta Jenderny.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Typical Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) is commonly caused by a ~1.5 Mb - ~1.8 Mb heterozygous deletion of contiguous genes at chromosome region 7q11.23. The majority of WBS cases occurs sporadically but few familial cases of autosomal dominant inheritance have been reported. Recent data demonstrated the existence of the paracentric inversion polymorphism at the WBS critical region in 7q11.23 in some of the progenitors transmitting the chromosome which shows the deletion in the affected child. In parents having a child affected by WBS the prevalence of such a structural variant has been reported to be much higher (~25- ~30%) than in the general population (~1- ~6%). However, in these previously reported studies only a limited number of randomly selected patients and non transmitting parents of WBS patients were used as controls, but without specification of any clinical data. Therefore we have undertaken a German population-based molecular cytogenetic investigation. We evaluated the incidence of the paracentric inversion polymorphism at 7q11.23 analyzing interphase nuclei of lymphocytes using a three color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe.
RESULTS: FISH analysis was carried out on couples with a child affected by WBS as compared to a population sample composed of different normal individuals: Control group I: couples with two healthy children, control group II: couples with fertility problems, planning ICSI and control group III: couples with two healthy children and one child with a chromosome aberration, not involving region 7q11.23. The three color FISH assay showed that the frequency of the paracentric inversion polymorphism at 7q11.23 in couples with a child affected by WBS was 20.8% (5 out of 24 pairs) as compared to 8.3% (2 out of 24 pairs, control group I), 25% (4 out of 16 pairs, control group II) and 9.1% (1 out of 11 pairs, control group III), respectively (total 7 out of 51 pairs, 13.8%). The frequencies differed between the groups, but this was statistically not significant (p > 0.05, Fisher's test).
CONCLUSION: Our results do not support the hypothesis that the paracentric inversion polymorphism at 7q11.23 is a major predisposing factor for the WBS deletion.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21054846      PMCID: PMC2993725          DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-3-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cytogenet        ISSN: 1755-8166            Impact factor:   2.009


  18 in total

1.  A 1.5 million-base pair inversion polymorphism in families with Williams-Beuren syndrome.

Authors:  L R Osborne; M Li; B Pober; D Chitayat; J Bodurtha; A Mandel; T Costa; T Grebe; S Cox; L C Tsui; S W Scherer
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Essential role of Fkbp6 in male fertility and homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis.

Authors:  Michael A Crackower; Nadine K Kolas; Junko Noguchi; Renu Sarao; Kazuhiro Kikuchi; Hiroyuki Kaneko; Eiji Kobayashi; Yasuhiro Kawai; Ivona Kozieradzki; Rushin Landers; Rong Mo; Chi-Chung Hui; Edward Nieves; Paula E Cohen; Lucy R Osborne; Teiji Wada; Tetsuo Kunieda; Peter B Moens; Josef M Penninger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms for genomic disorders.

Authors:  Ken Inoue; James R Lupski
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 8.929

4.  Copy number variation at the 7q11.23 segmental duplications is a susceptibility factor for the Williams-Beuren syndrome deletion.

Authors:  Ivon Cuscó; Roser Corominas; Mònica Bayés; Raquel Flores; Núria Rivera-Brugués; Victoria Campuzano; Luis A Pérez-Jurado
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  The genomic basis of the Williams-Beuren syndrome.

Authors:  C Schubert
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Autosomal dominant inheritance of Williams-Beuren syndrome in a father and son with haploinsufficiency for FKBP6.

Authors:  Kay Metcalfe; Emil Simeonov; William Beckett; Dian Donnai; May Tassabehji
Journal:  Clin Dysmorphol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.816

7.  Inversion of the Williams syndrome region is a common polymorphism found more frequently in parents of children with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Holly H Hobart; Colleen A Morris; Carolyn B Mervis; Ariel M Pani; Doris J Kistler; Cecilia M Rios; Kendra W Kimberley; Ronald G Gregg; Patricia Bray-Ward
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Mutations in the chromosome pairing gene FKBP6 are not a common cause of non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  G H Westerveld; S Repping; M P Lombardi; F van der Veen
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Prevalence estimation of Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Petter Strømme; Per G Bjørnstad; Kjersti Ramstad
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.987

10.  Fourteen new cases contribute to the characterization of the 7q11.23 microduplication syndrome.

Authors:  Nathalie Van der Aa; Liesbeth Rooms; Geert Vandeweyer; Jenneke van den Ende; Edwin Reyniers; Marco Fichera; Corrado Romano; Barbara Delle Chiaie; Geert Mortier; Björn Menten; Anne Destrée; Isabelle Maystadt; Katrin Männik; Ants Kurg; Tiia Reimand; Dom McMullan; Christine Oley; Louise Brueton; Ernie M H F Bongers; Bregje W M van Bon; Rolph Pfund; Sebastien Jacquemont; Alessandra Ferrarini; Danielle Martinet; Connie Schrander-Stumpel; Alexander P A Stegmann; Suzanna G M Frints; Bert B A de Vries; Berten Ceulemans; R Frank Kooy
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.708

View more
  2 in total

1.  Frequency of the 7q11.23 inversion polymorphism in transmitting parents of children with Williams syndrome and in the general population does not differ between North America and Europe.

Authors:  Colleen A Morris; Carolyn B Mervis; Lucy R Osborne
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 2.  Human inversions and their functional consequences.

Authors:  Marta Puig; Sònia Casillas; Sergi Villatoro; Mario Cáceres
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.