Literature DB >> 21054659

Quantification of the potential impact of cost-effectiveness thresholds on dutch drug expenditures using retrospective analysis.

Cornelis Boersma1, Adriaan Broere, Maarten J Postma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Other than the UK, The Netherlands has no formal threshold for cost-per-QALY values defined yet. For example, a cutoff value at €20,000 per QALY is sometimes mentioned in various discussions, however it has no formal status at all. Yet, since 2005, all new innovative do have to go through a cost-effectiveness evaluation though, with the assessment being focused on the methodology rather than on the exact cost-per-QALY outcome.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to estimate the potential impacts on Dutch drug expenditures had a formal threshold been applied in recent years.
METHODS: We analyzed national Dutch prescription data for the period 2005-2007, with respect to the costs of specific newly introduced drugs with reported positive cost-effectiveness ratios. Various threshold values were investigated.
RESULTS: In particular, our analysis suggests that modest, though annually increasing, reductions in Dutch drug expenditures could have been achieved in the recent period 2005-2007 if a threshold for cost-effectiveness at, for example, €20,000 per QALY been applied in The Netherlands. At thresholds of €0 and €20,000 estimated reductions in drug expenditures reflect approximately 0.25% of total Dutch drug expenditures and for thresholds of €50,000 and €80,000 this is only 0.01%.
CONCLUSIONS: Modest reductions in drug expenditures can be achieved if a formal threshold would be applied in The Netherlands. Potential reductions may be expected to increase in next years as expenditures for listed drugs increase further and new drugs become listed. Finally, we argue that for optimal and fair allocation of resources the in the health-care sector, application of a straightforward threshold is eminent and should not be postponed anymore.
© 2010, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21054659     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00736.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  22 in total

Review 1.  Cinacalcet: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in secondary hyperparathyroidism in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Reading a cost-effectiveness or decision analysis study: Five things to consider.

Authors:  Kate C Young; Adam G Kelly; Robert G Holloway
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-10

Review 3.  Using QALYs in cancer: a review of the methodological limitations.

Authors:  Martina Garau; Koonal K Shah; Anne R Mason; Qing Wang; Adrian Towse; Michael F Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The determinants of cost-effectiveness potential: an historical perspective on lipid-lowering therapies.

Authors:  Rodrigo Refoios Camejo; Clare McGrath; Marisa Miraldo; Frans Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Integrated and Person-Centered Care for Community-Living Older Adults: A Cost-Effectiveness Study.

Authors:  Ronald J Uittenbroek; Antoinette D I van Asselt; Sophie L W Spoorenberg; Hubertus P H Kremer; Klaske Wynia; Sijmen A Reijneveld
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Quetiapine: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Economic evaluation of a telephone- and face-to-face-delivered counseling intervention for smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Nadine Berndt; Catherine Bolman; Lilian Lechner; Wendy Max; Aart Mudde; Hein de Vries; Silvia Evers
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-03-22

Review 8.  Immuno-Oncology Medicines: Policy Implications and Economic Considerations.

Authors:  Georges Adunlin; Stefanie P Ferreri; Jenny Dong; Maisha Kelly Freeman
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2019-08-08

9.  Pharmacoeconomic spotlight on rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 (Rotarix™) in developed countries.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2012-12-01

10.  Economic evaluation of a weight control program with e-mail and telephone counseling among overweight employees: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marieke F van Wier; J Caroline Dekkers; Judith E Bosmans; Martijn W Heymans; Ingrid Jm Hendriksen; Nicolaas P Pronk; Willem van Mechelen; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.