Literature DB >> 21054520

Validation of an extension of the international non-invasive criteria for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma to the characterization of macroscopic portal vein thrombosis.

Paolo Sorrentino1, Luciano Tarantino, Salvatore D'Angelo, Luigi Terracciano, Umberto Ferbo, Alessandra Bracigliano, Luigi Panico, Giovanni De Chiara, Mariolina Lepore, Noe De Stefano, Francesco Fiorentino, Raffaela Vecchione.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We aimed to validate the non-invasive criteria for the characterization of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In a prospective study, we examined the impact of arterial hypervascularity, as established by the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommendations for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC, as a criterion for characterizing macroscopic PVT (EASL/AASLD extension criteria).
METHODS: A total of 96 cases of PVT detected using ultrasonography in patients with cirrhosis and HCC were included in the study. When coincidental arterial hypervascularity was detected by contrast perfusional ultrasonography and helical computed tomography, the thrombus was considered malignant according to our EASL/AASLD extension criteria. In all cases, an ultrasound-guided biopsy examination of the thrombus was performed.
RESULTS: Coincidental hypervascularity was found in 54 of 96 nodules (56.2%), and all were malignant upon biopsy (100% positive predictive value). Twenty-four (25%) had negative results with both techniques (non-vascular thrombus). Biopsies showed HCC in five non-vascular thrombi (5.3% of all thrombi) and in 13 of 18 thrombi with a hypervascularity result from only one technique.
CONCLUSIONS: The EASL/AASLD extension criteria for non-invasive diagnosis of malignant thrombosis were satisfied in 75.2% of malignant thrombi; thus, a biopsy is frequently required in this setting. However, in the presence of coincidental hypervascularity of a thrombus with both techniques, a biopsy is not required (absolute positive predictive value for malignancy). Relying on imaging techniques in thrombi could miss the diagnosis of malignant portal invasion in up to 24.9% of cases.
© 2011 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21054520     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06564.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  11 in total

1.  Small HCCs identified by screening.

Authors:  Petr Pancoska; Massimo De Giorgio; Stefano Fagiuoli; Brian I Carr
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Joint Consensus Statement of the Indian National Association for Study of the Liver and Indian Radiological and Imaging Association for the Diagnosis and Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incorporating Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Authors:  Sonal Krishan; Radha K Dhiman; Navin Kalra; Raju Sharma; Sanjay S Baijal; Anil Arora; Ajay Gulati; Anu Eapan; Ashish Verma; Shyam Keshava; Amar Mukund; S Deva; Ravi Chaudhary; Karthick Ganesan; Sunil Taneja; Ujjwal Gorsi; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Kumble S Madhusudan; Pankaj Puri; Shallini Govil; Manav Wadhavan; Sanjiv Saigal; Ashish Kumar; Shallini Thapar; Ajay Duseja; Neeraj Saraf; Anubhav Khandelwal; Sumit Mukhopadyay; Ajay Gulati; Nitin Shetty; Nipun Verma
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-08-06

3.  MRI in differentiating malignant versus benign portal vein thrombosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Value of post contrast imaging with subtraction.

Authors:  Rakhee Gawande; Hamed Jalaeian; Eric Niendorf; Deniz Olgun; Luke Krystosek; Nathan Rubin; Benjamin Spilseth
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part II. Extracellular agents, hepatobiliary agents, and ancillary imaging features.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Jeong-Min Lee; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  APASL and AASLD Consensus Guidelines on Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review.

Authors:  Cher Heng Tan; Su-Chong Albert Low; Choon Hua Thng
Journal:  Int J Hepatol       Date:  2011-04-19

6.  A prognosis model for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus following hepatic resection.

Authors:  Cheng-Zuo Xiao; Wei Wei; Zhi-Xing Guo; Shu-Hong Li; Yong-Fa Zhang; Jia-Hong Wang; Ming Shi; Rong-Ping Guo
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Percutaneous electrochemotherapy in the treatment of portal vein tumor thrombosis at hepatic hilum in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Luciano Tarantino; Giuseppina Busto; Aurelio Nasto; Raffaele Fristachi; Luigi Cacace; Maria Talamo; Catello Accardo; Sara Bortone; Paolo Gallo; Paolo Tarantino; Riccardo Aurelio Nasto; Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno; Pasquale Ambrosino
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Portal vein thrombosis with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma: a case study.

Authors:  Saba Salman
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

9.  Lobar hepatocellular carcinoma with ipsilateral portal vein tumor thrombosis treated with yttrium-90 glass microsphere radioembolization: preliminary results.

Authors:  M Pracht; J Edeline; L Lenoir; M Latournerie; H Mesbah; O Audrain; Y Rolland; B Clément; J L Raoul; E Garin; E Boucher
Journal:  Int J Hepatol       Date:  2013-02-17

10.  Role of FNA and Core Biopsy of Primary and Metastatic Liver Disease.

Authors:  John P McGahan; John Bishop; John Webb; Lydia Howell; Natalie Torok; Ramit Lamba; Michael T Corwin
Journal:  Int J Hepatol       Date:  2013-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.