Literature DB >> 21054432

Auditory evoked potentials dissociate rapid perceptual learning from task repetition without learning.

Boaz M Ben-David1, Sandra Campeanu, Kelly L Tremblay, Claude Alain.   

Abstract

Performance improvement during an hour of auditory perceptual training is accompanied by rapid physiological changes. These changes may reflect learning or simply task repetition independent of learning. We assessed the contribution of learning and task repetition to changes in auditory evoked potentials during a difficult speech identification task and an easy tone identification task. We posited that only task repetition effects would occur in the tone task but that task repetition and learning would interact in the speech task. Speech identification improved with practice (increased sensitivity d' with a constant response bias β). This behavioral improvement coincided with a decrease in the amplitude of sensory evoked responses (N1, P2) and a decrease in the amplitude of a slow wave (peak=320 ms after onset) over the left frontal and parietal sites. Results show rapid physiological changes associated with learning, distinct from changes related to task repetition.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21054432     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01139.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  21 in total

1.  Electrophysiological assessment of auditory stimulus-specific plasticity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ryan P Mears; Kevin M Spencer
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Rapid tuning of auditory "what" and "where" pathways by training.

Authors:  Yi Du; Yu He; Stephen R Arnott; Bernhard Ross; Xihong Wu; Liang Li; Claude Alain
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Pitch discrimination learning: specificity for pitch and harmonic resolvability, and electrophysiological correlates.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-04-12

4.  ERP correlates of auditory processing during automatic correction of unexpected perturbations in voice auditory feedback.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Laura Karvelis; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Restoration of sensory input may improve cognitive and neural function.

Authors:  Hanin Karawani; Kimberly Jenkins; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Improving older adults' understanding of challenging speech: Auditory training, rapid adaptation and perceptual learning.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Processing of self-initiated speech-sounds is different in musicians.

Authors:  Cyrill G M Ott; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The role of response bias in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Pete R Jones; David R Moore; Daniel E Shub; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Human decision making based on variations in internal noise: an EEG study.

Authors:  Sygal Amitay; Jeanne Guiraud; Ediz Sohoglu; Oliver Zobay; Barrie A Edmonds; Yu-Xuan Zhang; David R Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Brain activity underlying auditory perceptual learning during short period training: simultaneous fMRI and EEG recording.

Authors:  Ana Cláudia Silva de Souza; Hani Camille Yehia; Masa-aki Sato; Daniel Callan
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.