Literature DB >> 21052907

Relative peripheral refraction in patients with horizontal strabismus.

Kyoko Matsushita1, Satoshi Hasebe, Hiroshi Ohtsuki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether relative peripheral refraction (RPR) in strabismic children is different from that in normal children.
METHODS: We recruited 25 consecutive patients with comitant horizontal strabismus (mean ± SD age, 10.1 ± 2.6 years) as subjects and 37 children who had no ophthalmic disease except for refractive errors as controls. Cycloplegic refraction was performed with an autorefractometer while the subjects looked at one of five targets horizontally aligned within ± 30°. RPR was calculated by subtracting refraction in the primary position from that obtained at each gaze position.
RESULTS: Children with either esotropia or exotropia had small myopic RPR on average, whereas the controls showed significant hyperopic RPR. In children with exotropia, a wide intersubject difference in RPR was found in the nasal retina. These profiles of RPR were observed in both dominant and nondominant eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that children with horizontal strabismus have different RPR than normal controls. Defocus in the peripheral retina associated with the misalignment of the eyes during near work might be the reason for the differences, considering the visual regulation mechanism of eye shape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21052907     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-010-0856-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  14 in total

1.  Peripheral refractive errors in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic young subjects.

Authors:  Anne Seidemann; Frank Schaeffel; Antonio Guirao; Noberto Lopez-Gil; Pablo Artal
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Comparison of peripheral refractions determined by different instruments.

Authors:  David A Atchison
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Longitudinal changes in peripheral refraction with age.

Authors:  W N Charman; J A M Jennings
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  A review of peripheral refraction techniques.

Authors:  Cathleen Fedtke; Klaus Ehrmann; Brien A Holden
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Aberrations and myopia.

Authors:  W N Charman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Peripheral refraction along the horizontal and vertical visual fields in myopia.

Authors:  David A Atchison; Nicola Pritchard; Katrina L Schmid
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Peripheral refraction and ocular shape in children.

Authors:  D O Mutti; R I Sholtz; N E Friedman; K Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Hemiretinal form deprivation: evidence for local control of eye growth and refractive development in infant monkeys.

Authors:  Earl L Smith; Juan Huang; Li-Fang Hung; Terry L Blasdel; Tammy L Humbird; Kurt H Bockhorst
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Ocular shape and myopia.

Authors:  R A Stone; D I Flitcroft
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.473

10.  Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children.

Authors:  Jane E Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman; Thomas T Norton; Mohamed E M Hussein; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Ruth Manny; Ying Wang; Donald Everett
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.