Literature DB >> 21052898

Efficacy of diagnostic criteria for the differential diagnosis between obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction and aqueous deficiency dry eye.

Reiko Arita1, Kouzo Itoh, Syuji Maeda, Koshi Maeda, Atsuo Tomidokoro, Shiro Amano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate diagnostic criteria for obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) using three parameters (symptom score, lid margin abnormality score, and meibomian gland morphologic change scores) for differentiating obstructive MGD from aqueous deficiency dry eye (ADDE).
METHODS: Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients (mean age, 66.6 years) diagnosed with obstructive MGD and 15 eyes of 15 patients (mean age, 61.3 years) diagnosed with ADDE were analyzed. Ocular symptoms were scored from 0 to 14 according to the number of symptoms. Lid margin abnormality was scored from 0 to 4 according to the number of abnormalities. Meibomian gland changes were scored from 0 to 6 using noncontact meibography (meibo-score). Superficial punctate keratopathy was scored from 0 to 3. Meibum was graded from 0 to 3 according to volume and quality. Tear film break-up time was measured consecutively three times after instillation of fluorescein, and the median value was adopted. Tear film production was evaluated using the Schirmer test.
RESULTS: Ocular symptom and lid margin abnormality scores and tear film break-up time did not differ significantly between the obstructive MGD and ADDE groups. The meibum score and meibo-score were significantly higher in the obstructive MGD group than in the ADDE group. The Schirmer value was significantly lower in the ADDE group than in the obstructive MGD group. When obstructive MGD was diagnosed on the basis of three scores (ocular symptom score, lid margin abnormality score, and meibo-score) all being abnormal, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating between obstructive MGD and ADDE were 68.0% and 80%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the criteria were moderately reliable for differentiating patients with obstructive MGD from those with ADDE when the diagnosis of obstructive MGD was made on the basis of three abnormal scores, they do not provide comprehensive diagnostic tools for differentiating MGD, ADDE, and healthy individuals. We need to add other parameters such as the Schirmer test value and the meibum score to the diagnostic criteria to enhance their reliability for differentiating MGD and ADDE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21052898     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-010-0858-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  9 in total

1.  The oily layer of the tear film and evaporation from the corneal surface.

Authors:  S MISHIMA; D M MAURICE
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 2.  Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes.

Authors:  M A Lemp
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1995-10

3.  Rose bengal staining and cytologic characteristics associated with lipid tear deficiency.

Authors:  S H Lee; S C Tseng
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Noncontact infrared meibography to document age-related changes of the meibomian glands in a normal population.

Authors:  Reiko Arita; Kouzo Itoh; Kenji Inoue; Shiro Amano
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with Sjögren syndrome.

Authors:  J Shimazaki; E Goto; M Ono; S Shimmura; K Tsubota
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Ocular fatigue is the major symptom of dry eye.

Authors:  I Toda; H Fujishima; K Tsubota
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1993-06

7.  Ocular evaporation in meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye.

Authors:  W D Mathers
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Ocular surface changes and discomfort in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction.

Authors:  J Shimazaki; M Sakata; K Tsubota
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-10

9.  Proposed diagnostic criteria for obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction.

Authors:  Reiko Arita; Kouzo Itoh; Syuji Maeda; Koshi Maeda; Ayumu Furuta; Shima Fukuoka; Atsuo Tomidokoro; Shiro Amano
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 12.079

  9 in total
  16 in total

1.  Meibography: A review of techniques and technologies.

Authors:  Ryan J Wise; Rachel K Sobel; Richard C Allen
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10

2.  Long-term results of treatment with diquafosol ophthalmic solution for aqueous-deficient dry eye.

Authors:  Shizuka Koh; Chikako Ikeda; Yoshihiro Takai; Hitoshi Watanabe; Naoyuki Maeda; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Short-term effects of topical cyclosporine A 0.05% (Restasis) in long-standing prosthetic eye wearers: a pilot study.

Authors:  J W Han; J S Yoon; S Y Jang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Light transmission/absorption characteristics of the meibomian gland.

Authors:  Ho Sik Hwang; Yilu Xie; Elena Koudouna; Kyung-Sun Na; Young-Sik Yoo; Suk-Woo Yang; Donald J Brown; James V Jester
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Topical rebamipide improves the ocular surface in mild lagophthalmos.

Authors:  Mariko Itakura; Hirotaka Itakura; Tomoyuki Kashima; Hideo Akiyama; Shoji Kishi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-01

6.  Topical rebamipide improves lid wiper epitheliopathy.

Authors:  Hirotaka Itakura; Tomoyuki Kashima; Mariko Itakura; Hideo Akiyama; Shoji Kishi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-31

Review 7.  Revisiting the vicious circle of dry eye disease: a focus on the pathophysiology of meibomian gland dysfunction.

Authors:  Christophe Baudouin; Elisabeth M Messmer; Pasquale Aragona; Gerd Geerling; Yonca A Akova; José Benítez-del-Castillo; Kostas G Boboridis; Jesús Merayo-Lloves; Maurizio Rolando; Marc Labetoulle
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 8.  A Review of Imaging Biomarkers of the Ocular Surface.

Authors:  William W Binotti; Betul Bayraktutar; M Cuneyt Ozmen; Stephanie M Cox; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.152

9.  Meibomian gland dysfunction: endocrine aspects.

Authors:  Ozlem G Sahin; Elçin Kartal; Nusret Taheri
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-20

10.  Objective image analysis of the meibomian gland area.

Authors:  Reiko Arita; Jun Suehiro; Tsuyoshi Haraguchi; Rika Shirakawa; Hideaki Tokoro; Shiro Amano
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.