Literature DB >> 2105286

Pitfalls in the use of high energy X rays to treat tumors in the lung.

K E Ekstrand1, W H Barnes.   

Abstract

The problem of central axis dose reduction for high energy photon beams of small cross-sectional area traversing normal lung tissue is well known. An additional problem, which may be not as well appreciated, is the loss of electronic equilibrium on the periphery of high energy photon beams, resulting in an increase in the penumbra occurring in lung. We have compared profiles of x-ray beams ranging in energy from 4 MV to 18 MV. The profiles were measured at 10-cm depth in unit-density and lung-density (0.26) phantoms. At the highest energy the 20% to 80% physical penumbra width was measured to be 7.5 mm in the unit-density material, whereas in the lung phantom the width was 18 mm. At 4 MV the situation was reversed; that is, the penumbra was slightly smaller in the lung phantom. Most computer programs for radiation therapy treatment planning do not take into account this change in beam profile when calculating dose in the lung. As a result, unanticipated underdosing inside the field and greater dose outside the field can occur when high-energy X rays are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2105286     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90290-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  Dosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Ellen Yorke; Gregory Desobry; Chen-Shou Chui
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Treatment plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using either 6- or 10-MV photon energies.

Authors:  Zhigong Wei; Xingchen Peng; Ling He; Jingjing Wang; Zheran Liu; Jianghong Xiao
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.243

3.  Dosimetric comparison of different inhomogeneity correction algorithms for external photon beam dose calculations.

Authors:  Khadijeh Asnaashari; Mohammad Rasa Golrokh Nodehi; Seyyed Rabie Mahdavi; Somaye Gholami; Hamid Reza Khosravi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-04

4.  Integral dose and radiation-induced secondary malignancies: comparison between stereotactic body radiation therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marco D'Arienzo; Stefano G Masciullo; Vitaliana de Sanctis; Mattia F Osti; Laura Chiacchiararelli; Riccardo M Enrici
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Evaluation of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in an extreme water-lung interface phantom using Monte Carlo dose calculations.

Authors:  Isabelle M Gagné; Sergei Zavgorodni
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Dosimetric comparison of extended dose range film with ionization measurements in water and lung equivalent heterogeneous media exposed to megavoltage photons.

Authors:  Paule M Charland; Indrin J Chetty; Shigeru Yokoyama; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.