Literature DB >> 21052828

False positive mammograms in Europe: do they affect reattendance?

Talya Salz1, Jessica T DeFrank, Noel T Brewer.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 21052828      PMCID： PMC3160730          DOI： 10.1007/s10549-010-1245-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN： 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Talya Salz; Sarah E Lillie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Trock; B K Rimer; A Boyce; C Jepson; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; M B Barton; V M Moceri; S Polk; P J Arena; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A model of the influence of false-positive mammography screening results on subsequent screening.

Authors:  Jessica T Defrank; Noel Brewer
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2010

5.  International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done?

Authors:  B C Yankaskas; C N Klabunde; R Ancelle-Park; G Renner; H Wang; J Fracheboud; G Pou; J-L Bulliard
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Pamela M Vacek; Joan Skelly; Donald L Weaver; Berta M Geller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Kari Tyne; Arpana Naik; Christina Bougatsos; Benjamin K Chan; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lampic; E Thurfjell; P-O Sjödén
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Philip W Chu; Diana L Miglioretti; Edward A Sickles; Roger Blanks; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Janet K Bobo; Nancy C Lee; Matthew G Wallis; Julietta Patnick; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document.

Authors:  N Perry; M Broeders; C de Wolf; S Törnberg; R Holland; L von Karsa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 32.976
View more
  3 in total

1.  Psychological Outcomes After a False Positive Mammogram: Preliminary Evidence for Ethnic Differences Across Time.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-02-19

Review 2.  Over-reassurance and undersupport after a 'false alarm': a systematic review of the impact on subsequent cancer symptom attribution and help seeking.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Katriina L Whitaker; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts.

Authors:  Marta Román; Solveig Hofvind; My von Euler-Chelpin; Xavier Castells
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 7.640
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.