Literature DB >> 21052715

Sex differences in cognitive control are associated with midcingulate and callosal morphology.

Rene J Huster1, R Westerhausen, C S Herrmann.   

Abstract

Sex differences in the processing of cognitively demanding tasks have attracted much attention in recent years. While there seems to be some agreement on differences between males and females concerning spatial abilities and language skills, a consensus regarding executive functions or cognitive control has not been reached yet. In the present study, male and female subjects participated in a lateralized, tactile Stop-Signal task. Although the behavioral data did not show any differences between sexes, event-related potentials pointed to varieties in neurocognitive processing. As inferred from N200 amplitudes, differences between left- and right-hand stimulation suggested a strong degree of functional lateralization in males in accordance with a left-hemispheric dominance. Females, on the other hand, rather seemed to exhibit a functionally symmetric organization of relevant processes. The P300 did also show evidence of sex-related differences, reflecting disparities in the degree or quality of interhemispheric interaction. In addition, behavioral and electrophysiological parameters were correlated with individual metrics concerning the degree of midcingulate folding asymmetry and the morphology of the corpus callosum. Differential associations of these morphological characteristics with the N200 and P300, respectively, underscore the notion of relevant structure-function associations of the midcingulate cortex and the N200 on the one hand, and the corpus callosum and the P300 on the other hand. Obviously, these variations in neuroanatomy contribute to the observed behavioral and electrophysiological differences between women and men. © Springer-Verlag 2010

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21052715     DOI: 10.1007/s00429-010-0289-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Struct Funct        ISSN: 1863-2653            Impact factor:   3.270


  13 in total

1.  Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Eliza Congdon; Russell A Poldrack; Fred W Sabb; Edythe D London; Tyrone D Cannon; Robert M Bilder
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2013-05-15

Review 2.  Sex differences in impulsive action and impulsive choice.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Event-related potential correlates of performance-monitoring in a lateralized time-estimation task.

Authors:  Theo O J Gruendler; Markus Ullsperger; René J Huster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The influence of sex-linked genetic mechanisms on attention and impulsivity.

Authors:  Simon Trent; William Davies
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Sex-specific strategy use and global-local processing: a perspective toward integrating sex differences in cognition.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Sex differences in the IQ-white matter microstructure relationship: a DTI study.

Authors:  Beate Dunst; Mathias Benedek; Karl Koschutnig; Emanuel Jauk; Aljoscha C Neubauer
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Sex-Differences, Handedness, and Lateralization in the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Varsha Singh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-31

8.  Sex Differences in Gamma Band Functional Connectivity Between the Frontal Lobe and Cortical Areas During an Auditory Oddball Task, as Revealed by Imaginary Coherence Assessment.

Authors:  Toshiro Fujimoto; Eiichi Okumura; Atsushi Kodabashi; Kouzou Takeuchi; Toshiaki Otsubo; Katsumi Nakamura; Kazutaka Yatsushiro; Masaki Sekine; Shinichiro Kamiya; Susumu Shimooki; Toshiyo Tamura
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 9.  Function-structure associations of the brain: evidence from multimodal connectivity and covariance studies.

Authors:  Jing Sui; Rene Huster; Qingbao Yu; Judith M Segall; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  P300 development across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rik van Dinteren; Martijn Arns; Marijtje L A Jongsma; Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.