Literature DB >> 21051752

Switching from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to a belatacept-based regimen in renal transplant recipients: a randomized phase II study.

Lionel Rostaing1, Pablo Massari, Valter Duro Garcia, Eduardo Mancilla-Urrea, Georgy Nainan, Maria del Carmen Rial, Steven Steinberg, Flavio Vincenti, Rebecca Shi, Greg Di Russo, Dolca Thomas, Josep Grinyó.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prolonged use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidney transplant recipients is associated with renal and nonrenal toxicity and an increase in cardiovascular risk factors. Belatacept-based regimens may provide a treatment option for patients who switch from CNI-based maintenance immunosuppression. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This is a randomized, open-label Phase II trial in renal transplant patients with stable graft function and receiving a CNI-based regimen. Patients who were ≥6 months but ≤36 months after transplantation were randomized to either switch to belatacept or continue CNI treatment. All patients received background maintenance immunosuppression. The primary end point was the change in calculated GFR (cGFR) from baseline to month 12.
RESULTS: Patients were randomized either to switch to belatacept (n=84) or to remain on a CNI-based regimen (n=89). At month 12, the mean (SD) change from baseline in cGFR was higher in the belatacept group versus the CNI group. Six patients in the belatacept group had acute rejection episodes, all within the first 6 months; all resolved with no allograft loss. By month 12, one patient in the CNI group died with a functioning graft, whereas no patients in the belatacept group had graft loss. The overall safety profile was similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The study identifies a potentially safe and feasible method for switching stable renal transplant patients from a cyclosporine- or tacrolimus-based regimen to a belatacept-based regimen, which may allow improved renal function in patients currently treated with CNIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21051752      PMCID: PMC3052236          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.05840710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  34 in total

1.  Long-term renal allograft survival: have we made significant progress or is it time to rethink our analytic and therapeutic strategies?

Authors:  Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Jesse D Schold; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era.

Authors:  Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Jesse D Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Neoral rescue therapy in transplant patients with intolerance to tacrolimus.

Authors:  Marwan S Abouljoud; M S Anil Kumar; Kenneth L Brayman; Sukru Emre; J S Bynon
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Decreased renal function is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular death after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Rajendra Baliga; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Glomerular filtration rate measurements in clinical trials. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group and the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; T Greene; M D Schluchter; P A Cleary; P E Teschan; R A Lorenz; M E Molitch; W E Mitch; C Siebert; P M Hall
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Authors:  Brian J Nankivell; Richard J Borrows; Caroline L-S Fung; Philip J O'Connell; Richard D M Allen; Jeremy R Chapman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Hypertension in renal transplantation: donor and recipient risk factors.

Authors:  D Ducloux; G Motte; M Kribs; A B Abdelfatah; C Bresson-Vautrin; J M Rebibou; J M Chalopin
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.975

8.  Cyclosporine withdrawal from a mycophenolate mofetil-containing immunosuppressive regimen in stable kidney transplant recipients: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Daniel Abramowicz; Derek Manas; Mieczyslaw Lao; Yves Vanrenterghem; Domingo Del Castillo; Peter Wijngaard; Samson Fung
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Single human leukocyte antigen flow cytometry beads for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen antibody specificities.

Authors:  Rui Pei; Jar-How Lee; Neng-Jen Shih; Mike Chen; Paul I Terasaki
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Drug-related dyslipidemia after renal transplantation.

Authors:  A Scott Mathis; Nisha Davé; Gregory T Knipp; Gary S Friedman
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.637

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Immunosuppressive drug therapy.

Authors:  Choli Hartono; Thangamani Muthukumar; Manikkam Suthanthiran
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  Current state of renal transplant immunosuppression: Present and future.

Authors:  Hari Varun Kalluri; Karen L Hardinger
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2012-08-24

Review 3.  Autoimmune therapies targeting costimulation and emerging trends in multivalent therapeutics.

Authors:  Chuda Chittasupho; Teruna J Siahaan; Charlotte M Vines; Cory Berkland
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2011-07

4.  [Modern immunosuppression after solid organ transplantation].

Authors:  J Beimler; C Morath; M Zeier
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Novel immunosuppressive agents in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Karen L Hardinger; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2013-12-24

6.  Minimization vs tailoring: Where do we stand with personalized immunosuppression during renal transplantation in 2015?

Authors:  Lajos Zsom; László Wagner; Tibor Fülöp
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2015-09-24

7.  Late conversion from tacrolimus to a belatacept-based immuno-suppression regime in kidney transplant recipients improves renal function, acid-base derangement and mineral-bone metabolism.

Authors:  Kevin Schulte; Clara Vollmer; Vera Klasen; Jan Hinrich Bräsen; Jodok Püchel; Christoph Borzikowsky; Ulrich Kunzendorf; Thorsten Feldkamp
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 8.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew Scott Mathis; Gwen Egloff; Hoytin Lee Ghin
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

9.  Managing transplant rejection in the elderly: the benefits of less aggressive immunosuppressive regimens.

Authors:  Kristian Heldal; Karsten Midtvedt
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Metabolic consequences of modern immunosuppressive agents in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Oluwatoyin Bamgbola
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.